• Welcome to the Speedsolving.com, home of the web's largest puzzle community!
    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features.

    Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community of 35,000+ people from around the world today!

    If you are already a member, simply login to hide this message and begin participating in the community!

Blonk numbers and Center of the Cubieverse

Stefan

Member
Joined
May 7, 2006
Messages
7,287
WCA
2003POCH01
YouTube
StefanPochmann
darn I'm 375th I should go to some comps on other continents.
Interesting question I don't have an answer for yet: Can your rank get *worse* by going to a competition?

More precisely, compare these two scenarios:
1) You participated in competition X.
2) You didn't participate in competition X.
That's the only difference, everything else is the same.

In scenario 1, your average distance is probably lower and definitely not higher (unless you're connecting to an otherwise unconnected part of the graph). But what about your rank? By being there you not only lower your own average distance, you're also lowering other people's average distance. Is it possible that your rank is better in scenario 2?

Btw, I'm putting this on hold until Friday, need to work on something else now.
 
Last edited:

Stefan

Member
Joined
May 7, 2006
Messages
7,287
WCA
2003POCH01
YouTube
StefanPochmann

keemy

Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2007
Messages
151
WCA
2006CORR01
darn I'm 375th I should go to some comps on other continents.
Interesting question I don't have an answer for yet: Can your rank get *worse* by going to a competition?

More precisely, compare these two scenarios:
1) You participated in competition X.
2) You didn't participate in competition X.
That's the only difference, everything else is the same.

In scenario 1, your average distance is probably lower and definitely not higher (unless you're connecting to an otherwise unconnected part of the graph). But what about your rank? By being there you not only lower your own average distance, you're also lowering other people's average distance. Is it possible that your rank is better in scenario 2?

Btw, I'm putting this on hold until Friday, need to work on something else now.
yo I made a counter example on a graph but it was comparing having a comp with 2 people versus if 1 didn't show up so technically not allowed by wca rules but I don't want to make a more complicated graph.



so I'm trying to make it so with the comp top left comp goer will pass the bottom right comp goer (will worry about the rest of the people later, also I am going to use the sum of distances rather than average because the ranks will be the same)

so I want to find some solutions to the system of inequalities.

4m+3+2+k > 3+2k+(m+1) and 2(m+1) + (k+1) < 2k + (m+2)

simplifying we get 3m+1 > k and m+1 < k which works for k=3, m=1

then to verify i draw the graph with k=3 and m=1 (you can imagine it XP) and check to make sure what i wanted happened. As it turns out the bottom right comp goer was originally ranked 2nd and goes down the 3rd by attending the comp.

If someone wants to construct a case were at least 12 people must go to a competition that would be nice (or prove it's impossible)

oh and qq wrote a graph theory sounding definition for the question if anyone is interested:

start with a graph of people, with "distance" defined as avg minimal distance to other vertices, and "rank" defined as a point's rank in the list of possible distances. If you add a K_n to the graph (you can add vertices if you want), can you make the rank of any vertex in that K_n strictly worse compared to leaving that vertex out of the K_n and adding a K_(n-1) without them.

and I guess we want a case with n>= 13
 
Last edited:

Stefan

Member
Joined
May 7, 2006
Messages
7,287
WCA
2003POCH01
YouTube
StefanPochmann
No problem with the non-WCA-compliant competition size, that's arbitrary anyway. I disagree with your example, though.

As it turns out the bottom right comp goer was originally ranked 2nd and goes down the 3rd by attending the comp.
If I understand and analyzed your example correctly, he actually went from rank 5 to shared rank 3.
dontgo.png

Michael: Will check that tomorrow.
 
Last edited:

keemy

Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2007
Messages
151
WCA
2006CORR01
Stefan: B, C, D shouldn't be connected to each other. (so just add 2 to what you have b,c,d as in both your graphs)
 
Last edited:

megaminxwin

Current Clock NR Holder
Joined
Feb 17, 2010
Messages
575
WCA
2010MACA01
Distances to me:
0:1 (me)
1:32
2:563
3:4659
4:3757
5:76
none:19
Average: 3.3608
So I'm number 8676 in the list.

My Blonk Number:
3: Me
Melbourne Summer Open 2010
2: Dene Beardsley
San Francisco Open 2009
1: Bob Burton
WC 2005
0: Michiel Van Der Blonk
So my Blonk Number is 3.

w00t random statistics
 

Tim Reynolds

Premium Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2006
Messages
995
Location
Boston, MA
WCA
2005REYN01
YouTube
timbreynolds
Last night I was curious who else was near the top of the list of average distances, so Dave and I found the top 33. Not surprisingly, everyone on that list went to WC2009. Stefan, do you know who's highest on the list that didn't go to WC2009?
 

Tim Reynolds

Premium Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2006
Messages
995
Location
Boston, MA
WCA
2005REYN01
YouTube
timbreynolds
Last night I was curious who else was near the top of the list of average distances, so Dave and I found the top 33. Not surprisingly, everyone on that list went to WC2009. Stefan, do you know who's highest on the list that didn't go to WC2009?
I didn't go to WC2009.
...Ah, right. D'oh. I guess I assumed that since the other 32 of the top 33 did, you did too.
 

anders

Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
159
Location
Sweden
WCA
2003LARS01
Last night I was curious who else was near the top of the list of average distances, so Dave and I found the top 33. Not surprisingly, everyone on that list went to WC2009. Stefan, do you know who's highest on the list that didn't go to WC2009?
I didn't go to WC2009.
...Ah, right. D'oh. I guess I assumed that since the other 32 of the top 33 did, you did too.
That was a fair assumption, but I moved to Singapore right before the WC. I did my planning when it still was said that the WC will take place in Hong Kong...
 

JBCM627

Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2008
Messages
799
Location
Ohio, USA
WCA
2006MERT01
Would it be possible to see some sort of geographic representation of Blonk numbers? As in, a world map with an average number for each country. I wonder if there would be an obvious geographic correlation between average Blonk number and location of the 2 Blonk competitions (WC03 & WC05).

Should be straightforward enough to implement with one of these:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Blank_maps#World
 

Stefan

Member
Joined
May 7, 2006
Messages
7,287
WCA
2003POCH01
YouTube
StefanPochmann
New page showing everybody's stats (except the guys from the lone Dubai competition). Still rough and not using the newest data, but nice enough to show:
http://stefan-pochmann.info/cubieverse/cubieverse.html

how many people are at most distance 3 from everyone else in the large group of connected people?
26, you can see it now on that new page by sorting by distance 4 and seeing there are 26 with nobody at distance 4.

It seems that some of the top 10 people have this property, but they don't all.
Yes, only four do.

And Piti truly is the master of connections. He's at most 3 away from everyone and has the smallest number of distance-3 persons. All that with only 9 competitions.
 
Last edited:

Stefan

Member
Joined
May 7, 2006
Messages
7,287
WCA
2003POCH01
YouTube
StefanPochmann
Added showing number of competitions.

After Piti (rank 10 with only 9 competitions), the best ranks with fewest competitions are:

Rank 39 with only 5 competitions: Baramee Pookcharoen
Rank 96 with only 4 competitions: Arnold Soeparjanto
Rank 124 with only 3 competitions: Denis Goepfert
Rank 129 with only 2 competitions: Michael Layher (WC2007 and WC2009)
Rank 321 with only 1 competition: Eileen Henfling and 17 other people who only competed at WC2009

And in the other direction, bad rank despite many competitions:

Rank 1000 despite 20 competitions: Shenjia Zhang (only competed in east China)
Rank 5586 despite 10 competitions: Syoji Takamatsu (only competed in Japan)
Rank 7074 despite 8 competitions: Krzysztof Zygowski (only competed in Poland)
Rank 8325 despite 4 competitions: Ming-Yi Lin (only competed in Taiwan)

(this list is incomplete, done by hand)
 
Last edited:
Top