Blindsolving Accomplishment Thread

is it legal to use mini cubes at multi?

Of course. It's not like you're prevented from using, say, type F mixed with type A.

I think there are some cases of people being prevented from this. But I agree with Tim, it doesn't make sense. It seems like the rules aren't clear enough on this.
 
9/9 29:15 (19:15)
some cubes were ridiculously easy to remember, I dunno how but some of them just had a nice memo. maybe the scrambles were lucky :p
also, question: is it legal to use mini cubes at multi? at this one I used my mini QJ as the third cube, not to make it easier, just because it is a nice cube. I can recognise all of my cubes with a touch or with R-R's, so the size doesn't really help me during multi.

That's very fast. You are a contender for the WR!

I do not see any advantage to being able to recognize my cubes in multi. Since I memorized them, I already know everything. Anyway, as you said, it is usually possible to recognized our cubes just by few moves. So the only regulation that can make sense would be an extremely strict one (totally identical cubes). That would be VERY difficult to apply, for both competitors and judges, so that actually does not make sense...
 
9/9 29:15 (19:15)
some cubes were ridiculously easy to remember, I dunno how but some of them just had a nice memo. maybe the scrambles were lucky :p
also, question: is it legal to use mini cubes at multi? at this one I used my mini QJ as the third cube, not to make it easier, just because it is a nice cube. I can recognise all of my cubes with a touch or with R-R's, so the size doesn't really help me during multi.

That's very fast. You are a contender for the WR!

I do not see any advantage to being able to recognize my cubes in multi. Since I memorized them, I already know everything. Anyway, as you said, it is usually possible to recognized our cubes just by few moves. So the only regulation that can make sense would be an extremely strict one (totally identical cubes). That would be VERY difficult to apply, for both competitors and judges, so that actually does not make sense...
no I'm still not. and I won't ever be, I'm too lazy for that (practising + working out a new memo method and practising it until it becomes natural), and anyway if I wouldn't I still don't think I could ever go for WR
so using a mini is OK, but there are precedents about the opposite? oh well, until my next competition I'll have 9 good cubes without the mini just to make things sure (I already have them as I have like ~25 3x3s, I just like to use my bests so exec. is as fast as it can be - also an order with 4 3x3s is on its way)

also, congrats Joey ;)
 
Zava, can you try with all your 25 cubes? Just for fun. :D

uhhh. :D
not sure it's a good idea, as I said I'm using my single bld memo, which is ok for 9, but fails at larger amounts (reason#1 I'm not capable of wr even at home) :p
but we'll see. I'll need a friday for that as I don't have any lessons on that day, and the house is empty until ~4 pm. next free friday is 2 weeks from now on, I'm having a trip to München next week :p so if you remind me before the 26th of feb, I think I'll do a big attempt.
 
Last edited:
I just got my first blindsolve ever. (9:09.16 really slow). But hey, I can now tell people I have solved the rubik's cube blindfolded. :)

Fixed.

Solving it BLD once means you can't do it again?

Not always :P

To be able to say "I can" do something it must be a repeatable skill.

It's a bit like when you get a really lucky PB 3x3 solve and you might say "I can solve it in under 10 seconds" when really, you average about 20. I think it's safer to say "I have" until you've proven to yourself that it's reapeatable (by doing more successful BLD solves in this example)
 
Back
Top