TheCoolMinxer
Veteran
53 minutes is not that long xD22/23 MBLD NR in 53:13! Took me way to long to get it
seriously, gj
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
53 minutes is not that long xD22/23 MBLD NR in 53:13! Took me way to long to get it
UF is objectively betterI don't think UF is better, but it might be. That's why I'm learning it so I can compare to DF. Once I become 100% comfortable with UF I'll see which buffer I'm faster with
Objectively on what measure?UF is objectively better
Comms are the same for the most part (or arguably better, even), especially for edges where any case has a sub1-able comm. The reason it's better is because UF/UFR give the best 400+ 1C1E parity algs, and they are the first pieces you see when starting your memo. It's a small difference, but using UF/UFR as your primary buffers is probably the easiest way to be sub-20 global.Objectively on what measure?
yesterday I got 3 21's and a PB single
20.55 B2 U2 F2 D R2 F2 U B2 U L2 D L' R U' L' F' D B R2 D' F2
Reconstruction
MEMO: BFVWCH
LNWD BHJF AOXA
[x' z':[U' L' U, M]]
[z U:[L', U M U']]
u M' u2 M' u
[z' r U':[M', U2]]
[z':[U' R U, M']]
[U R':[U2, R' D' R]]
[x:[R U R', D2]]
[L' D' L, U2]
which cases are you talking aboutdude... fix your comms! this could have easily been sub 18.
that floating buffer is really bad, not sure of a better case though because I am still working on DFwhich cases are you talking about