- Joined
- Jun 7, 2007
- Messages
- 11,923
- Location
- Indianapolis
- WCA ID
- 2007HUGH01
- YouTube
- Visit Channel
In 40+ minutes I could cut a few seconds off my 5x5x5 speedsolve times, so I think doing bigcubes BLD is not worth it for me yet![]()
Wow, Dene! If for every 40 minutes I spent on 5x5x5 speedsolving I could cut a few seconds off my average times, I'd probably give up BLD cubing, at least for as long as that lasted (which probably wouldn't be very long).
I probably spend 2 hours a week or so on 5x5x5 speedsolving - it's the one form of speedsolving I actually pay much attention to. And I find that if I spend less than an hour and a half on it, I get slower - it takes that much just to stay at my current level. I might improve about half a second per week, on average, with lots of ups and downs along the way. Now I'm going through a bad period, so it seems like I got a lot worse.
On the other hand, when I was averaging 40 minutes on 5x5x5 BLD, it seems like I cut about 30 seconds off my average solving time with each attempt. (I remember that for my first 50 solves or so, more than half of my successful 5x5x5 BLD solves were new personal bests.) So 5x5x5 BLD had a lot more obvious benefit for practice than did speedsolving.
That's one reason why I got so hooked on BLD - it seems like you improve so much more quickly with BLD than with speedsolving.