DGCubes
Veteran
http://wc2017.f2l.org/live.php?cid=2349&cat=11&rnd=1
Daaaang, this round alone dropped me from 7th to 11th in the world.
Daaaang, this round alone dropped me from 7th to 11th in the world.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maciej czapieweski who won the round with a 2.47 average apparently uses LBLApparently the scrambles were really easy. A bunch of people got sub-2 singles and other PB's.
I got 3.46 which is amazing since I avg 4.7 lolJust tried them out. I got a 2.56 average, but I +2ed a 1.95 on the fourth solve. Without the +2, it would've been a 2.32 average...
![]()
Just tried them out. I got a 2.56 average, but I +2ed a 1.95 on the fourth solve. Without the +2, it would've been a 2.32 average...
![]()
There is a difference between record average and winning average.But does he deserve that record? Isn't pyraminx a "luck-based" event?
I got a 3.21 average with those.Just tried them out. I got a 2.56 average, but I +2ed a 1.95 on the fourth solve. Without the +2, it would've been a 2.32 average...
![]()
But does he deserve that record? Isn't pyraminx a "luck-based" event?
That doesn't make any sense. So because Pyraminx is more luck-based, then he doesn't deserve the record? Doesn't that mean that no results in Pyraminx should matter, because it's all luck-based and no one deserves the times that they get? Unless you cheated, why would you not deserve a record that you got?
ask DG Cubes: that's what he said here - https://www.speedsolving.com/forum/threads/marcin-kowalczyk-didnt-win-mbld-whyyyyyyy.65675/
Why wouldn't a winner in a "luck-based" event automatically deserve it? If you win pyraminx at a competition, do you fee like a "fraud"?