• Welcome to the Speedsolving.com, home of the web's largest puzzle community!
    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features.

    Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community of 35,000+ people from around the world today!

    If you are already a member, simply login to hide this message and begin participating in the community!

All-Round Rankings (KinchRanks)

Joined
Jul 23, 2008
Messages
496
Likes
1
Location
California, USA
WCA
2008YOUN02
YouTube
notkevin888
#81
Not sure where best to put this, but I've been idly thinking about the "most balanced" cuber for a while, based on some comment that someone made about their KinchRanks standard deviation (alas, I can't seem to find it now T__T). But now that I wanted to calculate this, I'm having trouble justifying exactly what it should look like.

So, the naive approach is to simply take the standard deviation of the per-event values - but then cubers who only do a couple events and are somewhat slow are greatly advantaged here. So I thought maybe using a metric like "standard deviation of all non-0 values", but it still greatly rewards slower cubers over faster ones (which isn't bad in and of itself, I guess, but I'd prefer rewarding doing more events more). I thought about standard deviation / overall KinchRank, which would help that, but there's the issue that competitors who do few events are rewarded. I also thought of things like total range of event KinchRanks over overall Kinchrank, but it still runs into similar problems, and also isolates out the best and worst (eg, a competitor who has event KRs of 40 for all but two events, which are at 0 and 100, will have a score of 100; meanwhile, a competitor who evenly has KRs ranging from 0 to 80 would be "more well rounded" by this metric).

Anyone have any thoughts for a good statistic for measuring both well-roundedness and speed?
 
Joined
Jul 23, 2008
Messages
496
Likes
1
Location
California, USA
WCA
2008YOUN02
YouTube
notkevin888
#82
Another KinchRanks-related thought, based on measuring the relative strengths of each country: the country rank on Daniel's site (https://sites.google.com/site/danielsheppardcuber/home/KinchRanksCountries) could suggest that Poland produces the best all-round cubers, but this ends up being rather false - instead, it produces the best _specialized_ cubers (what, with Marcin Kowalczyk contributing two 100% values despite having a personal KinchRank of 24.52 [coming in a 878th]). To answer the question of which region produces the best all-round cubers, perhaps we could take the average KinchRank of some top section of each country (either a flat number, like the top 10, or a percentage, like the top 1%), and compare those? Just curious what countries would stand on top with such a metric.
 
Joined
Dec 21, 2014
Messages
1,331
Likes
65
Location
Singapore
WCA
2015LAII01
#83
Another KinchRanks-related thought, based on measuring the relative strengths of each country: the country rank on Daniel's site (https://sites.google.com/site/danielsheppardcuber/home/KinchRanksCountries) could suggest that Poland produces the best all-round cubers, but this ends up being rather false - instead, it produces the best _specialized_ cubers (what, with Marcin Kowalczyk contributing two 100% values despite having a personal KinchRank of 24.52 [coming in a 878th]). To answer the question of which region produces the best all-round cubers, perhaps we could take the average KinchRank of some top section of each country (either a flat number, like the top 10, or a percentage, like the top 1%), and compare those? Just curious what countries would stand on top with such a metric.
The only reason why Poland is so good and other countries are dragged down is because of multi-BLD.
 
Joined
Jul 23, 2008
Messages
496
Likes
1
Location
California, USA
WCA
2008YOUN02
YouTube
notkevin888
#84
The only reason why Poland is so good and other countries are dragged down is because of multi-BLD.
Not the only reason - they actually are fairly good at all events (although I definitely agree that mbld is by far the largest factor). Consider that their worst event KinchRank is 75.61 (in 2x2), for example. But more telling towards my point, their OH, Feet, Clock, Skewb, 6x6, 7x7, 3bf, _and_ 5bf are all above 90 (along with mbld, of course), but of those 8 events, 7 different people hold titles (the only repeat being 6x6 and 7x7 by Michał Halczuk). This suggests that the region doesn't actually have very many true all-rounders (or, maybe, no all-rounders can hold a NR compared to the specialists in the region).

As an easy comparison, see that Australia is basically dominated by Feliks, with Jay taking most of the other events except some BLD events (which Zane has) and Clock (which Tomas Macadam has).
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2017
Messages
54
Likes
10
WCA
2016CUEV04
#93
Bump!!
Now that means will be recognized for big blinds and there's kinda a new structure, will these be taken into account?
If so, is the code prepared for this change?
 
Joined
Oct 19, 2017
Messages
521
Likes
316
WCA
2015KUCA01
YouTube
channel/UCKY9uCII2wIfPmLidA_KXMA
#94
Bump!!
Now that means will be recognized for big blinds and there's kinda a new structure, will these be taken into account?
If so, is the code prepared for this change?
Code probably isn't prepared, but it'll probably act like it does for fmc and 3bld where it's whatever is better between your single and mean.
 
Top