• Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!

    You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.

    Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.

    Registration is free, fast, and easy — create your account today.

    Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.

AlgDb.NET

I just felt in love with the site good job guys !

Some little ideas :
-A link to a site that shows the alg performs // like speedsolving wiki and alg.cubing.net
-A mode that let the user select a specific set of alg, select one alg for each cases then the server send a printable file with the icon of the cases and the alg.
-You can add parentheses when entering an alg, the prog doesn't take them in count but other users can choose to see them // (enabled : (R U R' U'); disabled : R U R' U')
 
Last edited:
Thank you! Now to add all ~20 of my PBLs...

E: done, sorry for making you go through all of these...

I'm actually really glad you did this, because I was thinking of asking you to write them up anyway.

Also, I meant to ask you a long time ago if you did anything special for when you have a solved top and bar on bottom from different angles.
 
Last edited:
What if there is a mirror for a case for WVLS? I want to add in a RUF alg for the first case, but I don't know how to say that it's a mirror without putting "(Mirror)" infront of the alg. Should I just add it regularly even though it's the mirror?
 
What if there is a mirror for a case for WVLS? I want to add in a RUF alg for the first case, but I don't know how to say that it's a mirror without putting "(Mirror)" infront of the alg. Should I just add it regularly even though it's the mirror?

Added. Sorry for the late response. Also note that a "mirror alg" function is being added. So soon this case group will be removed; however, I added it for convenience until then.

I would like to have separated OH and 2H sections. i think boca had those... That would be great!

This will be happening. There are OH OLL and OH PLL sections already.

I just felt in love with the site good job guys !

Some little ideas :
-A link to a site that shows the alg performs // like speedsolving wiki and alg.cubing.net
-A mode that let the user select a specific set of alg, select one alg for each cases then the server send a printable file with the icon of the cases and the alg.
-You can add parentheses when entering an alg, the prog doesn't take them in count but other users can choose to see them // (enabled : (R U R' U'); disabled : R U R' U')

-If you click on the algorithm you are viewing, it shows stats, people who use the alg, and a link to twisty.js which is currently inactive but will eventually show the algorithm being executed. Stachu has informed me that it is going to be active sooner than later in regards to features, so keep an eye out for it being activated.
-Printable files has been discussed but we have other things we would like to add first. It is on a to do list and will be added as a later feature.
-That is a fantastic idea if I am understanding it correctly. Giving the ability for users to "highlight" triggers on the algorithms, that is unique to that persons login, so that they can better view and remember algorithms. Sounds complex =P but the idea is definitely noted. I like this idea as I learn algorithms by noting triggers within the algorithms and also associating them with similar algorithms I know.

I really like this site and I use it a lot :D Do you think you could add sections for both big cube OLL and big cube PLL?

I am not sure about Big cube OLL and PLL as they can just be added to the regular OLL and PLLs sections. Maybe having the ability under "People that use this alg Click if you use the alg." column to select an alg for big cubes instead of 3x3x3. I will look more into this idea in the future as I am organizing parities, L2E, and L2C algorithms to add as well.
 
Last edited:
I realise some of the ZBLL U algs are rather bad...


I'll try to upload some of my ZBLL U OH algs soon.
I should be uploading algs, I'll do some now.

Edit: T is done, btw is it necessary to have all of the separate sets on the homepage? Why not just one link to ZBLL, EG, COLL etc... and then separate them on a different page. It just looks kind of messy.
 
Last edited:
.
I should be uploading algs, I'll do some now.

Edit: T is done, btw is it necessary to have all of the separate sets on the homepage? Why not just one link to ZBLL, EG, COLL etc... and then separate them on a different page. It just looks kind of messy.


Seconded. Great site. [emoji8]


.
 
How about incorporating ZZF2L algorithms to the database? I have a lot of interesting cases to solve the 2x2x1 blocks that I would like to share.

On another note, is there a way to simply add a voting system, similar to the one on boca?
 
Can you please refresh me as to what BOCA's system was for voting?
The site is still down, and I do not remember how they had such set up.

As for ZZF2L: likely not, at least not soon. ZZF2L doesn't fit within the normal bounds of a case group, but I have thoughts on some F2L bits on the site in the future that I'll explore some day.
 
Can you please refresh me as to what BOCA's system was for voting?
The site is still down, and I do not remember how they had such set up.

As for ZZF2L: likely not, at least not soon. ZZF2L doesn't fit within the normal bounds of a case group, but I have thoughts on some F2L bits on the site in the future that I'll explore some day.

Ah ok, that is a bummer, I guess I will work on my own list in the mean time :)

Boca had a + and - next to the alg, meaning if you think the alg is bad you can vote -, and if its good you can vote +. + adds 1, and - removes 1, which makes the algorithm with the highest number the one people use the most. This can however be a bit imbalanced, since you can negate other peoples votes by voting -, but that can easily be rectified by simply removing the option to vote -. Obviously you can only vote once per algorithm.

They also had a "My Alg" option that only you could see, so you can easily select the algorithms that you use for future reference. The algs you select as "My Alg" jumped to the top of the list of that specific case, but obviously only for you.
 
I was thinking it would be a little bit cooler if the note "There are also 0 algs submitted for this case pending admin approval." only appeared if the number is greater than zero?
Not sure how possible this is, but it always catches my eye - and it's nearly always 0 anyway!
Sorry if this is a bit "moany" because I really like the site.
 
Back
Top