[Unofficial] 3.22s 3x3 fullstep by Tymon Kolasiński

[abunickabhi]

Is this WB for full step solve? I am not sure yo.

He released a nice tutorial on the cubicle YT as well, on improving F2L pairs.

 

[J41]

Always blows me away watching those reconstructions. Grouse solving!

 

[OtaMota]

Kinda fake solve, this is the same scram

 

[DuckubingCuber347]

Kinda fake solve, this is the same scram
View attachment 30857

Thanks so much for pulling this up. Yes... This is a very notorious fake scramble that has been floating around the internet for years and used for many fake solves. @VincentCuber was honest when he shared it but people attempting this scramble have not always been that honest. It seems Tymon has decided to be dishonest.
What sets Tymon apart is two things.
Firstly, he is a very notable cuber. He is high ranking in many events with several CRs and even WRs in the past. Impressive... It would be hoped that lying on YouTube would be unnecessary at this point since he has already proven himself but perhaps his ego was struggling.
Secondly, most people go for the blindingly obvious solution. I first stumbled upon this scramble when I was averaging around ~17-18. I was able to find this certain solution immediately. It is simply beyond belief that one of the most intelligent cubers in cubing history would pass by such an object solution. Especially because Tymon is know for his inspection skills. A sub-6 solver doing the solution of a beginner cuber? Unlikely.
Thirdly, he did not provide the scramble in the video. This was odd at first why he wouldn't share the scramble. It's such an easy copy/paste task. Now, with the discovery that it's an infamous fake scramble, it makes perfect sense. If anyone decided to try the scramble for themselves they would implied find the more optimal solution and see that Tymon was fooling around in the hopes of deceiving his young viewers (given the age demographics, the average viewer is likely of the age of 14 or younger)

 

[Gecko777]

Thanks so much for pulling this up. Yes... This is a very notorious fake scramble that has been floating around the internet for years and used for many fake solves. @VincentCuber was honest when he shared it but people attempting this scramble have not always been that honest. It seems Tymon has decided to be dishonest.
What sets Tymon apart is two things.
Firstly, he is a very notable cuber. He is high ranking in many events with several CRs and even WRs in the past. Impressive... It would be hoped that lying on YouTube would be unnecessary at this point since he has already proven himself but perhaps his ego was struggling.
Secondly, most people go for the blindingly obvious solution. I first stumbled upon this scramble when I was averaging around ~17-18. I was able to find this certain solution immediately. It is simply beyond belief that one of the most intelligent cubers in cubing history would pass by such an object solution. Especially because Tymon is know for his inspection skills. A sub-6 solver doing the solution of a beginner cuber? Unlikely.
Thirdly, he did not provide the scramble in the video. This was odd at first why he wouldn't share the scramble. It's such an easy copy/paste task. Now, with the discovery that it's an infamous fake scramble, it makes perfect sense. If anyone decided to try the scramble for themselves they would implied find the more optimal solution and see that Tymon was fooling around in the hopes of deceiving his young viewers (given the age demographics, the average viewer is likely of the age of 14 or younger)

are you sure? wow.

 

[kake123]

Kinda fake solve, this is the same scram
View attachment 30857

Thanks so much for pulling this up. Yes... This is a very notorious fake scramble that has been floating around the internet for years and used for many fake solves. @VincentCuber was honest when he shared it but people attempting this scramble have not always been that honest. It seems Tymon has decided to be dishonest.
What sets Tymon apart is two things.
Firstly, he is a very notable cuber. He is high ranking in many events with several CRs and even WRs in the past. Impressive... It would be hoped that lying on YouTube would be unnecessary at this point since he has already proven himself but perhaps his ego was struggling.
Secondly, most people go for the blindingly obvious solution. I first stumbled upon this scramble when I was averaging around ~17-18. I was able to find this certain solution immediately. It is simply beyond belief that one of the most intelligent cubers in cubing history would pass by such an object solution. Especially because Tymon is know for his inspection skills. A sub-6 solver doing the solution of a beginner cuber? Unlikely.
Thirdly, he did not provide the scramble in the video. This was odd at first why he wouldn't share the scramble. It's such an easy copy/paste task. Now, with the discovery that it's an infamous fake scramble, it makes perfect sense. If anyone decided to try the scramble for themselves they would implied find the more optimal solution and see that Tymon was fooling around in the hopes of deceiving his young viewers (given the age demographics, the average viewer is likely of the age of 14 or younger)

Here's your answer:

For people who are not logged in, the comments above on his YT vid:

@silasbreault:
Am I the only person who sees this is the Cubing Encoded 5 second scramble?

Reply
@tymon_kolasinski:
interesting!, this is an excerpt from a video I made for GAN's Cubestation department, trying different scrambles from their followers on instagram

Reply
@silasbreault:
Nice! I realized because if you just do the 2 move x-cross you get 3 free pairs into t perm. I figured you just haven't seen the scramble before.

Also thanks @JDAW6, you a real one:

 

[Arcanist]

Here's your answer:
View attachment 30862

He should probably mention that in the video instead of leading us to believe that it was a randomly generated scramble.

 

[Gecko777]

so he was just doing a fake scram to see how fast he could get?

 

[DuckubingCuber347]

Here's your answer:
View attachment 30862

Very interesting. I still belidve he was misleading in his presentation but I am assured he wasn't being intentionally deceptive

 

[DuckubingCuber347]

Also worth mentioning that it's not fullstep as the scram, done right, gives OLL skip

That can be said about any scramble. Done right, the scramble would have given an LL skip.

 

[NebraskanSpeedsolver]

That can be said about any scramble. Done right, the scramble would have given an LL skip.

I mean, yeah, this is true. But from what I remember about the scram (and re solving it) it gives the free pairs into Tperm, no OLL. I'll watch the video back but I thought that that's what happened

Edit: I'm dumb, there was OLL in his solve. I'll delete the post. My apologies

 

[Justincubes]

I mean, yeah, this is true. But from what I remember about the scram (and re solving it) it gives the free pairs into Tperm, no OLL. I'll watch the video back but I thought that that's what happened

Edit: I'm dumb, there was OLL in his solve. I'll delete the post. My apologies

Yeah he used a counter intuitive solution which had some setup moves in the x-cross to preserve a pair which also prevented the oll skip

 

[Gecko777]

That can be said about any scramble. Done right, the scramble would have given an LL skip.

but it could have a very bad solution to get the ll skip.

 

[Justincubes]

but it could have a very bad solution to get the ll skip.

Yeah, the one time I ever got a last layer skip it was on the worst cross solution I've ever done. It obviously isn't always like this - you could get one with the most optimal solution for the scramble. Since my solution was so bad, even someone with lookahead that good probably couldn't have found my solution because it was so bad