[Unofficial] 1.79 2x2 average of 12 (1.84 if you are strict about inspection time)

RCTACameron

Veteran
Joined
Jul 13, 2010
Messages
1,597
Location
Melbourne, Australia
WCA ID
2010STOL01
YouTube
Visit Channel

1.72, 1.66, 1.81, 2.18, (2.33), 1.75, 1.68, 1.78, 1.69, 1.72, (1.55), 1.86 = 1.79

34. 1.72 R2 U R U F2 R' F2 R U R' U'
35. 1.66 R' U2 F2 R F' R2 U' F2 U2 R2 U'
36. 1.81 F U F' U2 F' R' F R' F' R2 U'
37. 2.18 F U' F U2 F2 U' F2 R U' R' U'
38. 2.33 U2 F2 U' R2 U2 F R2 U' F2 R' U'
39. 1.75 F2 R2 U2 R F R F U2 R' F2 U'
40. 1.68 R2 F2 R' F2 U F' R2 F2 U2 R' U'
41. 1.78 R2 F R2 F' R U F U' F R' U'
42. 1.69 R2 F2 U R F2 U' R2 U' F2 R' U'
43. 1.72 U' R2 F2 R F' U F R2 U R' U'
44. 1.55 U2 R U' R F' R' F' U2 F' R' U'
45. 1.86 U2 R' U' R2 F2 U2 R' F' U' R' U'

If you count the 1.81 as a DNF because of the 20s inspection, then the average is 1.84.
It's great to finally beat my 2x2 average of 12 PB again, even if it is only by 0.01.

Cube: WitTwo
Method: Full EG
Timer: Stackmat connected to computer with Prisma Puzzle Timer.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Which website did you get the EG1+EG2+CLL algorithms?

http://www.speedcubing101.com/ for most of them, except I think I got the Sune and Anti-sune EG-1 algorithms from http://cube.danrcohen.com/eg1.html.

2.18 and 1.75 should be +2. With both counting, avg is not even sub-2 (2.24).

From what I saw when editing the video, these were like 15.x inspection... and keep in mind that it takes at least a second to check my scramble against the picture of the scramble PPT provides. So really, the actual inspection for these would be <15s.
 
Back
Top