∞ signs that you've been cubing for too long

That's just when you're slow and want to attribute the slowness to something other than yourself.
699. when you no longer admit to being slow
700. when you find people asking you about 4lll

and no my cube does get a lot of dirt in it and it does affect my time, not by much but a bit, especially when i use maru for lubricating (it was worse when i used silicone spray) but usually it takes a long time to build up enough and it is more noticeable on stickerless cubes
 
703. when you try to solve with the beginners, method but just cannot resist easy F2L pairs
704. when you have to say when you see someone else not noticing an F2L pair
705. when you learn algorithm subsets like COLL, WV.
706. when you learn a large subset like VLS, ZBLL, 1LLL
707. when you invent an alt set of 1833 algorithms known as FNPOLL (forced N-perm OLL)
708. when you try and make FNPOLL algorithms
709. when you even think of FNPOLL
710. what about FFPOLL or FEPOLL
 
711. when you actually start thinking of potential weird subsets that are not beneficial
712. when you come up with another one: AELS (anti edges last slot) that stops the edges from being orientated during last slot
713. when you have to go and post FNPOLL on the new method and subsets concept idea thread
 
Last edited:
719: when you try to develop an oll algset that forces there to be two opposite solved edges in the pll stage, reducing pll to only H, T, A, and E cases.
720: When you try to develop a method that compliments that algset
721: when you attempt to figure out how many algs would be necessary for said algset.
 
719: when you try to develop an oll algset that forces there to be two opposite solved edges in the pll stage, reducing pll to only H, T, A, and E cases.
720: When you try to develop a method that compliments that algset
721: when you attempt to figure out how many algs would be necessary for said algset.
If you mean something like OLLEP, that wouldn't include a T perm. EP isn't solved in a T perm. Also recognition would be worse than my normal PLL recognition (pretty bad!)
 
If you mean something like OLLEP, that wouldn't include a T perm. EP isn't solved in a T perm. Also recognition would be worse than my normal PLL recognition (pretty bad!)
I said two solved edges, not all four. with two, a T perm is completely possible. Also, if there were 5 cases instead of 21, your recognition would actually drastically improve, which is the whole reason I thought of it in the first place. If you meant OLL recognition, that is to be expected.
 
Back
Top