Świerklany Open 2011 4 WRs

[amostay2004]

That seems does break the rule but disqualifing the solvewould be ridiculous. 2:10 is still the fastest average achieved by a human, which I think is the point of a WR

I know that if there wasn't the 2nd round michal mightn't have got the record but 2:10 is still the fastest average achieved by a human

So why don't we all just ignore the rules and have 100 rounds of 3x3 per competition. Since the times would count anyway even if it breaks the rules.

 

[That70sShowDude]

Wow, awesome records. Glad I have some Polish blood.

In to see if the 6x6 WR counts.

 

[MaeLSTRoM]

I think it is likely that It will get discounted. See here: http://worldcubeassociation.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=937

 

[Benyó]

so where's the problem? i still didn't get it, there were 8 people in the 1st round and 7 < 8 i think

nice wrs guys (not like there are any other lame wr than István's)

 

[RyanReese09]

25% have to be cut IIRC from each round? CBF to look it up.


There wasn't enough cut, and if there were, not enough for another round.

 

[Stefan]

so where's the problem? i still didn't get it, there were 8 people in the 1st round and 7 < 8 i think

Earlier there were only seven shown, someone got added later.

25% have to be cut IIRC from each round? CBF to look it up.
There wasn't enough cut, and if there were, not enough for another round.

Um... looks like 50% were cut. Nice try.

 

[RyanReese09]

Earlier there were only seven shown, someone got added later.



Um... looks like 50% were cut. Nice try.

I assumed that since Bence was saying 7 < 8, that 7 people were in the 2nd round.I don't understand what he was trying to say then.

 

[Meep]

Earlier there were only seven shown, someone got added later.
.

Did they just forget to add his results in or did they just sneak him in after? 'Cause there's 9l:

9l) All competitors must compete in each round during the same time frame.

 

[Vincents]

Yeah the last entrant that just got added looks kind of suspicious o_O

 

[JackJ]

Time Frame is kind of broad though. One could interpret it as they must all compete their solves before the competition ends. However I could be entirely wrong.

 

[David1994]

Any videos of the world records???

 

[Meep]

Time Frame is kind of broad though. One could interpret it as they must all compete their solves before the competition ends. However I could be entirely wrong.

I think it's understood as everyone having to do their solves for a round, during that specific round.

 

[tx789]

7x7 is scarey

 

[Stefan]

I assumed that since Bence was saying 7 < 8, that 7 people were in the 2nd round.I don't understand what he was trying to say then.

Right, that was weird. I thought he meant the 7 from first round as discussed in this thread, but maybe he did mean second round and its last place being place 7 (which is flawed as actually there are only four (duplicated) persons).

 

[Adam96]

Michał Halczuk's WRs are recorded. Piotr's - no.
6x6 WR is good. In first round were 8 competitiors.

 

[qqwref]

Piotr's - no.

D:

Do you have a scramble, by any chance?

 

[Meep]

Michał Halczuk's WRs are recorded. Piotr's - no.
6x6 WR is good. In first round were 8 competitiors.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but it looked like they just snuck that 8th guy in after the discussion began.

 

[amostay2004]

Wait, so were there 8 competitors in the first round or 7? If there were 8 then it's not against the rules at all even if there are <8 in the 2nd round, unless what Meep said is true =/

And why is Piotr's WR not recorded?

 

[TanLaiChen]

wow.......very fast......

 

[Adam96]

Wait, so were there 8 competitors in the first round or 7? If there were 8 then it's not against the rules at all even if there are <8 in the 2nd round, unless what Meep said is true =/

And why is Piotr's WR not recorded?

1. 7x7 final is void. (But WRs are in 1st round)
2. Because nobody record.