@Silky you are saying you ran a simulation to solve DR/DL while simultaneously orienting the remaining 6 edges and it averages 7.0 to 7.5 moves? With around 800 algorithms?
That seems really low considering L5E, solving UL and orienting the remaining 4 edges averages around 8.0 moves....
If...
Plants breathe carbon dioxide. Essential for all plant life on Earth. So if you love plants you should actually wish that CO2 goes up, not down, as plants would thrive at about 10 times more than the current CO2 level in the atmosphere. Oh wait, everyone is brainwashed into thinking CO2 is a...
One comment I would add is that ordinary (old) LMCF averages around 42 moves with all the algorithms although ergonomics is poor, and thus TPS is not a match for more modern methods. When Zayn got the new 2x2 WR averaging under 10 moves, I was shocked, because LMCF at 42 moves assumes 12.9 for...
I appreciate the direction the method is going. However, the difference versus Roux lies only in the single DR edge that is left unsolved during the second block, and then solved later in a more complex L7E.
If on the other hand you leave out both the DL edge and the DR edge, then solve CLL...
Welcome beardedberskerkr. If you solve the cube with a pre-established method you'll find it takes a lot less brain power than chess; it would mostly be 'recognize the case, execute the algorithm.' The exception is if you get into multi-slotting which requires extremely fast & advanced...
I agree that MANY of the LEG-1 algorithms are WAY better than the EG-1 versions. Plus LEG-1 has extra use in certain 3x3 methods, like LMCF-H and WaterRoux.
I learned LEG1 before EG-2, but in general I don't recommend that path.
I think people are missing the fact that the OP knows anti-CLL, so he can solve EG-2 cases in 1 look using that.