[Unofficial] 6.03 3x3 Single (last layer skip)

[Edward_Lin]

the 6.03 is the 2nd solve in her session, but according to the picture she posted it's the first solve...

 

[Ninja Storm]

You can click "best time" on qqtimer, and it'll give you the one solve...

 

[Edward_Lin]

that doesn't change the fact that the solve is fake...

 

[yoshinator]

the 6.03 is the 2nd solve in her session, but according to the picture she posted it's the first solve...

Reason that the solve is fake

You can click "best time" on qqtimer, and it'll give you the one solve...

Completely disproves the reason

that doesn't change the fact that the solve is fake...

"fact"

Because logic.

 

[Edward_Lin]

She got the scramble then opened up a new qqtimer. Once she got a good solve on camera, she entered the time into the original qqtimer and took a picture of it.

 

[SirWaffle]

the 6.03 is the 2nd solve in her session, but according to the picture she posted it's the first solve...

So you're saying, I generated a scramble via qqtimer with it already saying it is a 6.03 next to it, found a way to make it be a LL skip, rehearsed the solve over and over until I got a 6.03 exactly???? Because that is the only way I can think one would cheat with the scramble being screen shot. Would anyone like me to upload the solve before hand and a screen shot of the 6.03 next to the scramble of the one before it? Because I have that available. I didn't *****ing fake this solve and I am willing to do anything to prove it at this point.

 

[Edward_Lin]

So you're saying, I generated a scramble via qqtimer with it already saying it is a 6.03 next to it, found a way to make it be a LL skip, rehearsed the solve over and over until I got a 6.03 exactly???? Because that is the only way I can think one would cheat with the scramble being screen shot. Would anyone like me to upload the solve before hand and a screen shot of the 6.03 next to the scramble of the one before it? Because I have that available. I didn't *****ing fake this solve and I am willing to do anything to prove it at this point.

you can enter times with typing

 

[kcl]

She got the scramble then opened up a new qqtimer. Once she got a good solve on camera, she entered the time into the original qqtimer and took a picture of it.

Dude. It's her PB. you don't just expect that on camera. Chill.

 

[ScottTheCuber]

you can enter times with typing

Ok thats is different you dont type a tyme and it somehow stops aligned with your solve. Two a easy cross and a ll skip with a solver that averages around her should get that. Two i solve in 20 seconds and usong this scramble when it was posted the cross was way to easy.

 

[TheDubDubJr]

So you're saying, I generated a scramble via qqtimer with it already saying it is a 6.03 next to it, found a way to make it be a LL skip, rehearsed the solve over and over until I got a 6.03 exactly???? Because that is the only way I can think one would cheat with the scramble being screen shot. Would anyone like me to upload the solve before hand and a screen shot of the 6.03 next to the scramble of the one before it? Because I have that available. I didn't *****ing fake this solve and I am willing to do anything to prove it at this point.

You could go to a competition and get solves similar to what you are posting. That would obviously prove that you are able to get times like these.
People believe times from a competition a lot more than singles at home.

 

[SirWaffle]

You could go to a competition and get solves similar to what you are posting. That would obviously prove that you are able to get times like these.
People believe times from a competition a lot more than singles at home.

Pay for my flights to go to at least a half dozen more comps so I can get over my nerves plox then I will get times like this

 

[uberCuber]

You could go to a competition and get solves similar to what you are posting. That would obviously prove that you are able to get times like these.
People believe times from a competition a lot more than singles at home.

^ Pretty much this. You shouldn't at all be surprised at people not believing you after getting sup-17 averages at your last comp

 

[TheDubDubJr]

Pay for my flights to go to at least a half dozen more comps so I can get over my nerves plox then I will get times like this

Lol flying. I just drove 17hours for my last competition. I am pretty sure there are some in the area that you don't need to fly to.
And I don't understand why nerves are a big deal. (Chris did say I was shaking a lot during my WR single but I felt like I wasn't nervous at all)

 

[SirWaffle]

Lol flying. I just drove 17hours for my last competition. I am pretty sure there are some in the area that you don't need to fly to.
And I don't understand why nerves are a big deal. (Chris did say I was shaking a lot during my WR single but I felt like I wasn't nervous at all)

Yea I don't mind driving, drove 12 hours to go to Indiana, but regardless traveling is still pricey. And I just have bad nerves, I don't know what else to say, it is just the way I am.

 

[uvafan]

Yea I don't mind driving, drove 12 hours to go to Indiana, but regardless traveling is still pricey. And I just have bad nerves, I don't know what else to say, it is just the way I am.

Having bad nerves is a fixable problem. You care too much about getting good times. The less you care, the better you'll do.

 

[kcl]

Having bad nerves is a fixable problem. You care too much about getting good times. The less you care, the better you'll do.

That's what I found at my second comp. I was pretty relaxed compared to most people at my first comp, but at my second I had no nerves whatsoever, even for my main events. That's basically why I did well in 2x2. No shaky

But yeah, basically get over nerves by doing a ton of performance. I have no nerves because of competing in yoyo for years. The same thing can happen with public speaking, debate teams, etc.

 

[Antonie faz fan]

I've been cubing for less than 6 months and have gotten at the VERY least 5 LL skips.
Now, Sirwaffle spends a BUNCH of time cubing, it's like all she does. BUUUUUT... I'm sorry, normally I'd defend you on this, but I don't believe it. Especially since I was once noobishly almost going to start posting faked solves.
Plus, reconstruction isn't super finger friendly. I'm just having a hard time believing this. I can do it in the same amount of time knowing the scramble, but still this is just........

you are wrong.
she ended her last solve and then scrambled the cube and as you see the scramble that she used in the reconstruction is the same as the one she made the screenshot of.
the only way she could cheat is by cutting then findin a solution with ll skip and then continou but sirwaffle is just being honest with us I am 100% sure.

 

[Tim Major]

Here you go;

http://i.imgur.com/1ts3K6m.png

Took me 10 seconds, too lazy to remove the spelling errors from microsoft word.

All I'm saying is your "proof" proves absolutely nothing so stop acting like this solve COULDN'T be faked.

 

[Antonie faz fan]

Here you go;

http://i.imgur.com/1ts3K6m.png

Took me 10 seconds, too lazy to remove the spelling errors from microsoft word.

All I'm saying is your "proof" proves absolutely nothing so stop acting like this solve COULDN'T be faked.

Cant sem to find a LL skip

 

[Tim Major]

Cant sem to find a LL skip

Where's the :fp when I need it;

screen shot of the timer showing that was indeed the scramble qqtimer gave me: http://sirwaffle.weebly.com/pic.html

1. 6.03 D L2 R2 D' L U' B2 R2 U' D F' U2 F U R D2 B' R U' B' U R' D2 U F2

z2 y' //inspection

U2 R' U2 R' F //cross

R' U R U' R' U' R //1st pair

U L' U L U' L U L' //2nd pair

y' U R' U2 R //3rdpair

U2 R U R' U' R U R' //4th pair

U //AUF

Cube: Silver wei long