Iggy
Legend
7:46.77 5BLD DNF, 3 corners and 2 x-centers 
Edit: 7:21.34 DNF many pieces. Such an easy scramble, memo was sub 3:30
Edit: 7:21.34 DNF many pieces. Such an easy scramble, memo was sub 3:30
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Conclusion: my UWR is very easy to beat, so don't even think about it, Ollie, please!
7BLD UWR attempt - DNF(28:20.66) by a few wings.
Conclusion: my UWR is very easy to beat, so don't even think about it, Ollie, please!
Based on the fact that current UWR speeds on 5x5x5 are sub-5, and I'm the only person in the world who's ever really worked very hard on 7x7x7, and my ratio of best times, 7x7x7:5x5x5, is 37:11, I believe that an appropriate amount for UWR for someone good at 5x5x5 who works relatively as hard as I did at 7x7x7 vs. 5x5x5 would be sub-17.
Notice that sub-17 was achieved in 6BLD relatively recently. But seems you're right in general, because 7x7 centers represent as much information as I memorize training 5 minute binaries event in memoriad simulator; pieces that are left can be also memorized in sub-5, so 10 minutes memorization is possible on 7x7. As for execution, I don't know; It's obviously a bit harder than on 5x5, I'm not sure someone can achieve same tps as in 5BLD... And the motivation to train 5BLD is significantly bigger - you can get official WR, whereas 7BLD nerding can only give you an unofficial record.
anyway, I'll keep on doing 7BLD just because I really like it, it's not that long and it's a good alternative way to improve my memo.