How many cubers have already achieved sub40 4x4?

[cubernya]

3bld 45 avg5 seems a bit too fast, and 10 point multi doesn't seem like enough.

Really? Only 27 people have achieved this officially (all of which would be included since they're all singles), which isn't anywhere near like what others are (look at 3x3).

In terms of BLD, I was just taking what Noah put down. After looking, I actually think 1:00 or 1:10 would be more reasonable

 

[yoinneroid]

In the 2x2 database, I think Asia Khon is Asia Konvittayayotin from thai

 

[ottozing]

2.67 2x2 average for me, Jayden McNeill (Australia). And Luke Bruce from Australia has an 8.6x 3x3 ao12 (He's not active on ss).

 

[antoineccantin]

Megaminx should be sub-1 avg12, not avg5.

 

[yoinneroid]

I submitted 2.12 2x2 for Adrian Jorghy, but it seems it is only his ao5, his ao12 was 2.57

 

[bobthegiraffemonkey]

I'd make 4BLD sub-5 too (why am I making this harder for myself?), I agree with sub-15 5BLD, and not sure about 3BLD or MBLD, though I would make MBLD harder.

 

[ben1996123]

maby there should be a separate páge for 2x2staquemat and 2x2spacebár

 

[emolover]

2.12 avg5 and 2.75 avg12 Stackmatted BTW.

I think 2x2 should be sub 2.5 average of 12.

 

[cubernya]

After multiple people have said so, I've decided to change 2x2 to sub 2.5. I should be getting a 4BLD and 5BLD list up soon, which will include official results

 

[ottozing]

After multiple people have said so, I've decided to change 2x2 to sub 2.5.

****!!! Time to practice -___-

 

[Escher]

maby there should be a separate páge for 2x2staquemat and 2x2spacebár

Deffo.

 

[antoineccantin]

After multiple people have said so, I've decided to change 2x2 to sub 2.5. I should be getting a 4BLD and 5BLD list up soon, which will include official results

Good decision, sub-3 is too easy.

Even I have a 2.9x avg12, lol

 

[cubernya]

I've added 3BLD and Pyra (50 and 5 respectively). I was going to do bigBLD, but then I realised it would involve minutes...so until I get that figured out it's not going up

Anyway, updated list:

5x5	1:10	Avg12
6x6	2:20	Avg5
7x7	3:30	Avg5
Mega	1:00	Avg12
Sq-1	20	Avg12
4BLD	5:00	Single
5BLD	15:00	Single
MBLD	10 pts	Single

ALSO: I've only gotten 2 submissions for sub40 4x4. It would be awesome if there are others, so if you know of any submit them! Even if you don't know a time, just put in 39. ...it's pretty simple

 

[Divineskulls]

I'm super late, but this was a really good idea.

I'm excited for results for mega to start going up, so I can be motivated to get a sub-1 avg12.

 

[mitch1234]

Some of the times for cubes are a bit to ambiguous, I'm pretty sure only a few people (like 7 people have) have gotten a sub-3:30 avg of 12 on 7x7. If we look at the number of sub-10 people officially it should reflect that number with the number off people that have gotten sub-x:yz for 7x7. Otherwise the 3x3 thread should be sub-8.9ish.
Just a thought.

Also I entered for pyra, not sure what the text said at the end because it went by so fast.

 

[qqwref]

I like how I haven't done any of these ._.

And yeah, some of these times will have very few people. I don't think sub-10 is nearly as exclusive as you guys think. It's *definitely* not world class anymore, or even that impressive. I think some of these times are only so strict because people are thinking about how amazing the 10-second barrier used to be, but now, pretty much any serious person with good turnspeed will make it there. Going off the speedsolving wiki:
- 2.5s 2x2x2 is 47% slower than the UWR (1.70) but that's probably because of how lucky even an avg12 in 2x2x2 can be, I know the top people do a lot of solves too
- 10s 3x3x3 is 44% slower than the UWR (6.94)
- 1:00 megaminx is 29% slower than the UWR (46.26)
- 15s 3x3OH is 26% slower than the UWR (11.88)
- 1:10 5x5x5 is 21% slower than the UWR (57.64)
- 2:20 6x6x6 is 21% slower than the UWR (1:55.37)
- 3:30 7x7x7 is 18% slower than the UWR (2:56.85)
- 40s 4x4x4 is 17% slower than the UWR (let's say 34.00, to not undershoot)

PS: pls add sub10 computer cube (just 3x3speed), I'd like to see how many people have bothered to practice that.

 

[Alcuber]

Damn, I'm close with pyra, I have 5.06 average of 12. Gotta get practicing.

 

[yoinneroid]

There is sub 0 at pyra and 3bld :O
Anyway, Sebastian Weyer had a 38.64 on vid, but I'm sure his pb is lower than that

 

[tim]

4BLD	5:00	Single
5BLD	15:00	Single
MBLD	10 pts	Single

These are waaaay too easy. Especially 15:00 for 5BLD. 10:00 would be more appropriate.

 

[cubernya]

Also I entered for pyra, not sure what the text said at the end because it went by so fast.

It's just saying that it has to be reviewed before it'll be added, since somebody decided to screw around when it was first put up

- 2.5s 2x2x2 is 47% slower than the UWR (1.70) but that's probably because of how lucky even an avg12 in 2x2x2 can be, I know the top people do a lot of solves too
- 10s 3x3x3 is 44% slower than the UWR (6.94)
- 1:00 megaminx is 29% slower than the UWR (46.26)
- 15s 3x3OH is 26% slower than the UWR (11.88)
- 1:10 5x5x5 is 21% slower than the UWR (57.64)
- 2:20 6x6x6 is 21% slower than the UWR (1:55.37)
- 3:30 7x7x7 is 18% slower than the UWR (2:56.85)
- 40s 4x4x4 is 17% slower than the UWR (let's say 34.00, to not undershoot)

Do you have suggestions for better times?

PS: pls add sub10 computer cube (just 3x3speed), I'd like to see how many people have bothered to practice that.

I should be able to do that!

Damn, I'm close with pyra, I have 5.06 average of 12. Gotta get practicing.

There is an almost sub5

There is sub 0 at pyra and 3bld :O
Anyway, Sebastian Weyer had a 38.64 on vid, but I'm sure his pb is lower than that

Yes, there's a sub 0 because there's no times in it. After a time is added it works properly.
I'll add in his 38.64

These are waaaay too easy. Especially 15:00 for 5BLD. 10:00 would be more appropriate.

I realise you have over 60 official successes in a row, but you think that's too easy?!