[WR] 2x2 single 0.69 Christian Kaserer

[Florian]

 

[Mal]

Yay! Any video

 

[PandaCuber]

Wtf...

 

[Ágoston Török]

The most of this 0.69 is picking up the cube. I made a 0.81 to this scramble first try, and a 0.21 when the cube was already in my hands

 

[Branca]

Here's the 0.83

 

[Branca]

And the 0.72

 

[Diniz]

Now its time to remove 2x2 single of the ranking list.

 

[Dacuba]

Why?

Just have another epic oldest world record for the fututre
I like how they must have noticed first that everyone makes those times, and you KNOW that is YOUR chance in advance, and you have only that one chance to break the WR

 

[Michael Womack]

brand of 2x2 and method?

 

[AustinReed]

brand of 2x2 and method?

you can't be serious...

 

[Kirjava]

method?

god's alg

 

[Michael Womack]

you can't be serious...

I am cause I want that 2x2 and learn the method

 

[danthecuber]

learn the method

:fp

Good luck generating and learning 3,674,159 algorithms.

 

[mitch1234]

I am cause I want that 2x2 and learn the method

I'm going to give you an honest answer, its the Type C 2x2 and F2L.

 

[Michael Womack]

I'm going to give you an honest answer, its the Type C 2x2 and F2L.

ok thanks

 

[collinbxyz]

I'm going to give you an honest answer, its the Type C 2x2 and F2L.

 

[Ranzha]

ok thanks

BUT IT SHOULDN'T MATTER
Um, just because you use the same method and the same cube, there is no guarantee you'll get fast times.

 

[IanTheCuber]

Yeah...real big reaction.

 

[mitch1234]

BUT IT SHOULDN'T MATTER
Um, just because you use the same method and the same cube, there is no guarantee you'll get fast times.

And most people won't come close to this.

 

[Hershey]

I'm going to give you an honest answer, its the Type C 2x2 and F2L.

No, it's OrtegaZB!