New Event ideas (Poll)

What events do you want to be official?

  • 4x4 OH

    Votes: 47 12.5%
  • 3x3 OH BLD

    Votes: 55 14.7%
  • Skewb

    Votes: 201 53.6%
  • 6x6 BLD

    Votes: 54 14.4%
  • 7x7 BLD

    Votes: 54 14.4%
  • 360

    Votes: 14 3.7%
  • 5x5 OH

    Votes: 17 4.5%
  • 2x2 BLD

    Votes: 134 35.7%
  • relays (2x2-4x4,2x2-5x5.2x2-7x7)

    Votes: 181 48.3%
  • Heli Cube

    Votes: 37 9.9%

  • Total voters
    375
Heh, actually it was my post (number 106 in this thread) from before ;)

To be clear: 4x4 OH and 5x5 OH are in my opinion ridiculous events too. Also I don't have anything against multi BLD, 4x4 BLD or 5x5 BLD. I admire those who are good at it deeply!
I just think 3 'big' BLD events are too many for the time we have available at competitions and therefore it would be good if one (just one) of them would go.
So yah you are completely right if you say 3BLD =! multi BLD. I should've said multi BLD/4x4BLD/5x5BLD are too similar and keep 3x3 BLD out of it.
 
also super square-1, jinx pyraninx, mastermorphinx, Pyramorphinx, tertaminx, 2x2x3, 2x2x4, 3x3x2,

Because everyone has those puzzles. Think about what you are going to post and make sure it at least is relevant to the thread. If not get the hell off this forum.

The reason this puzzles you have listed are not part of the weekly competitions is because very few people in comparision to the already implemented puzzles have them.
 
I think that WCA should incorporate some team solving into an event. It would be something totally new from what we have now. I suggest adding Team BLD.

The thing is with TeamBLD, how do you manage it? Would the times go to the caller, or the solver, or both? And would people be able to choose their own teams? Or would it be random selection on the day, if it is random, how do you get people of similar skill together?

TeamBLD would be cool, but its unlikely itll become official because of the logistics IMO
 
The thing is with TeamBLD, how do you manage it? Would the times go to the caller, or the solver, or both? And would people be able to choose their own teams? Or would it be random selection on the day, if it is random, how do you get people of similar skill together?

TeamBLD would be cool, but its unlikely itll become official because of the logistics IMO

I totally agree with on who who gets the time and who your partner is.
 
The thing is with TeamBLD, how do you manage it? Would the times go to the caller, or the solver, or both? And would people be able to choose their own teams? Or would it be random selection on the day, if it is random, how do you get people of similar skill together?

TeamBLD would be cool, but its unlikely itll become official because of the logistics IMO

Okay. So.

The way I've seen Team BLD working is such that people are given the right to choose their own partner, times go to both participants, and at one competition, a competitor may have only one partner (i.e. a competitor may not be on two or more teams). The caller and solver are labelled as such on the records page and the two participants may NOT switch roles.
That way, everyone wins.
That's how it's gone down at Stanford, except the results aren't official, of course.

As far as actual regulations go, I proposed something a while back (here).

+1 for Team BLD. Easier than one would expect to manage.
 
Back
Top