• Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!

    You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.

    Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.

    Registration is free, fast, and easy — create your account today.

    Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.

[Official] [Podium winners 3x3] World Championship 2011

We all have bad days AnsonL. Faz came 3d in WC with his bad day, nothing to be ashamed of. In fact its somthing to be proud of. I still think he can go sub 5/sub 7 avg if he troops on the way he's going.
 
The original is very good already:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fH7a5UM6wdU&feature=channel_video_title
The above video wochuy91 uploaded is just his dumb poor quality copy.

Edit: Oh wait, you mentioned Feliks, so you're probably talking about the original video that wochuy91 posted and then for some reason removed...

I have the whole Feliks vs Michal finals without cuts..from beginning to the end, that's what I meant. But I was closer to Michal so Feliks' solves are not that visible.
 
Feliks won 2x2x2, 4x4x4, 5x5x5, 6x6x6! He is a human not a god :) I think that ranks much higher than winning the 3x3x3 event only :D Add to that 2 new WR's also ...

Per

EDIT: Actually 3 or 4. He improved 1 ...
 
Last edited:
[youtubehd]S0Cv0cpmEIc[/youtubehd]

Kinda far to see the solve, but I guess the reactions are way better :)

Can the OP/mod put this in the first post? Also I think the thread title should at least look better
 
feliks didn't even watch michal solves
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Michał Pleskowicz - 1st place World Championship 2011 - 8.65 average of 5
1st solve - 8.94
U2 F R2 F2 R' U2 B R2 F2 L' U' R F2 L2 U' R' F U'

x2 // inspection
D L D' y' R' U2 R' F R // unaligned cross
R' U R L' U L D' // keyhole Xcross
R' U' R U2 R' U' R U R' U' R // 2nd pair
(R U R' U')2 R U R' // 3rd pair
y U' R' R U' d' U' R U R' d' L' U L // 4th pair
U r' U2' R U R' U r // OLL
U R U R' F' R U R' U' R' F R2 U' R' // PLL
alg.garron

8.94sec : 73htm/76etm : 8.17/8.50tps
2nd solve - 7.68
R2 D L2 U' F' L2 F' R2 B' L' D2 B' U F2 L D2 U' F

y' // inspection
D R' D x U r' // cross
U' R U' R' L U' L' // 1st pair
U2 y' R' U R // 2nd pair
U2' R U' R' U' L U L' // 3rd pair
U y' R' U2 R U R' U' R // 4th pair
U2 R U R' U R U2' R' // OLL
U' F R U' R' U' R U R' F' R U R' U' R' F R F' // PLL
alg.garron

7.68sec : 58htm/62etm : 7.55/8.07tps
3rd solve - 8.41
B' F2 D2 F D' F D2 U' B R2 D B2 F2 L B' R2 F' R F'

x2 // inspection
U' R2 U y' l' L2 U (x' y') // cross
R U' R' // 1st pair
U2 L' U L // 2nd pair
U2 L U' L' U L U L' // 3rd pair
U2 R' U R U' R' U' R // 4th pair
F U R U' R' F' // OLL
U' R U' R U R U R U' R' U' R2 U' // PLL
alg.garron

8.41sec : 48htm/51etm : 5.71/6.06tps
4th solve - 8.72
R2 B' F2 U F L' B D' B' U2 B2 F' R2 B2 D F R2 U'

x2 y // inspection
R' D L F' L2' U' D // cross
U L U' L' R' U R // 1st pair
y2' U2 R U' R' L U' L' // 2nd pair
(R' U' R U)2 R' U' R // 3rd pair
R U R' U2' R U R' // 4th pair
U' R U R' U R U2 R' // OLL
U R' U' F' R U R' U' R' F R2 U' R' U' R U R' U R U2' // PLL
alg.garron

8.72sec : 67htm/72etm : 7.68/8.26tps
5th solve - 8.83
R2 F2 D2 L' B2 D R' U2 F2 D2 L U F2 D F' D2 F

y x // inspection
U r R' U' F R' // unaligned cross
D' R U R' D' // cross with preserved pair
y U' R U' R' // 1st pair
U U L U L' // 2nd pair
U L' U' L U2 L' U L // 3rd pair
U R' U' R U R' U' R // 4th pair
U' U2 L F' L' U' L U F U' L' // OLL
R2 U' R' U' R U R U R U' R U // PLL
alg.garron

8.83sec : 58htm/60etm : 6.57/6.80tps
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Now I'm wondering whether you just wanted to share your observation or whether you're trying to tell us something with it (and if so, what)...
I think he did this to don't get nervous (that's what his face tells me), if so I guess it didn't work :(
becouse you can't get any information about the scramble watching your opponent time I mean this shouldn't have been the reason should it?
 
Back
Top