Blindsolving Failure Thread

Doning some MultiBLD-practice. Maybe I should not do this by late evening.

15/20 in 1:32:28 (1:01.54)
2 cubes with each 2 corners flipped
2 cubes with each 2 edges flipped
1 cube off by 3 edges

less points than the attempt some days ago (16/20 in 1:54:04), but much better in time.

.. Oh, I nearly forgot to add that I used a big route, I just made during this Multi. I put just the LPs at my way to work. This worked surprisingly good.
 
Perform ((M' U')*3 M' U)*2 M' U2 M' U2 M2 on a solved cube and tell me how many pieces are flipped in place.
He never said there were other edges off. So I see no point in what you were trying to show <_<.
the way i read it is that when he scrambled the cube there was 3 edges in place but flipped, and then the buffer would be flipped when the rest is solved.
If that were true he would have said 4 edges were flipped then. I don't think people would exclude their buffer as a wrong edge, if it were wrong (wording is bad).
 
He never said there were other edges off. So I see no point in what you were trying to show <_<.

If that were true he would have said 4 edges were flipped then. I don't think people would exclude their buffer as a wrong edge, if it were wrong (wording is bad).
I agree with vcuber13. His specific words were "The scramble had 3 edges misoriented". That clearly means 3 edges which were in place, but flipped. So I had no trouble understanding what he meant; I thought it was quite clear. It's true that from a solving approach perspective, there were 4 edges flipped, but from a perspective of just looking at the scramble, there were only 3.

I'm pretty sure I've described scrambles that way before. It makes it clear what you're dealing with.
 
I agree with vcuber13. His specific words were "The scramble had 3 edges misoriented". That clearly means 3 edges which were in place, but flipped. So I had no trouble understanding what he meant; I thought it was quite clear. It's true that from a solving approach perspective, there were 4 edges flipped, but from a perspective of just looking at the scramble, there were only 3.

I'm pretty sure I've described scrambles that way before. It makes it clear what you're dealing with.

He said he was off 3 misoriented edges. That implies he was looking at the cube after the solving phase. Which as we all know, isn't possible.

I just reread his post, I read it wrong, I assumed he had already done the solve, and was explaining what it was off by, but he said "the scramble had..." which, you are correct, means he had 3 edges flipped in place at the beginning of the scramble.
 
3rd attempt at 3x3 Blind. Off by 3 friggen edges :mad: Oh well better than last time :D
About 19:00.00 memo
About 8:00.00 execution
About 1:00.00 to try to decide if I had finished
28:01.02 total
I'll get it sometime :)
 
Probably 11th attempt at 3x3 blind off again by 3 edges :(
Had an easy T- Perm parity
memo - 6:00.00
total - 11:48.62
I'll get it sometime *sigh*
more than two times faster than my last post at least
 
Last edited:
46.56. Before you all go WTF I'll explain.

I was in IRC chatting, forgot to go over to QQtimer again, started memo, execution for corners (comms) went amazingly well. I had just gone over those cases an hour before hand. Everything went fast. Expecting sub1 surely. But then I took off blindfold, and it was success, but I didn't switch tabs.

So I redid the scramble, reviewed edges, rememo'd corners, took about 15s total, and got that.

Just :fp at me forgetting to switch tabs, woulda been fast :-/.
 
Back
Top