My Rantings Concerning 3x3 Methods.

[waffle=ijm]

MOAR MOAR MOAR!
OH OH OH
make rant about how waffo is really a troll

 

[Julian]

Expect more long posts like these in weeks to come. I've been meaning to rant about a few things, and this is just one of them!

Can't wait

 

[Hershey]

MOAR MOAR MOAR!
OH OH OH

That's what she said 0__0

 

[Edward]

Oh wow that's a fleshed out post. Rated max out and subscribed to read later

 

[Athefre]

You were questioning the lack of popularity for MGLS. One reason is, like you suggested, the number of sequences. Over 100 cases is hard to accept to save 1-2 moves.

I don't often see MGLS mentioned either. It needs someone to frequently post fast videos for more people to use it. It's like all of these things I put on my site or post in Random Cubing Discussion. I think a few of my ideas have potential, but they aren't popular because I don't promote and I'm not an active video solver.

 

[Brest]

Stachu, I think I love you.

 

[Ranzha]

Tony Fisher's method is also interesting.
http://tonyfisherpuzzles.net/F How I solved Rubiks Cube.html

Would this go under CF? I think it's in the same area as CFCE on the triangle.

 

[irontwig]

Tony Fisher's method is also interesting.
http://tonyfisherpuzzles.net/F How I solved Rubiks Cube.html

Would this go under CF? I think it's in the same area as CFCE on the triangle.

imho the only interesting thing about it is that Tony came up with by himself. It would be in the neighbourhood of Waterman, as it has the same steps (FL, CLL, L8E) just in more moves and looks.