[Unofficial] 0.47 Square-0 Single, Cyrus Colah

[Cyrus C.]

Scramble: /////////

While it was technically full-step, that was really lucky! I knew that case by heart! I'm not sure what the UWR I think this must be pretty close!

 

[Andrew Ricci]

Oh dear...

I want to find it funny, but it's just too hard to laugh at this.

 

[Rubenajax]

wasn't it a +2?

 

[ianini]

Stopped with wrists, +2

 

[Toad]

What's your lucky PB?

Also, I have reason to believe that scramble isn't an official optimal one.

 

[Edward]

I don't get it .-.

 

[uberCuber]

Oh dear...

I want to find it funny, but it's just too hard to laugh at this.

my reaction exactly..

 

[Cubenovice]

You should try some more of these, you may even get a lucky scramble...

 

[qqwref]

Oh dear, but that's not a Square-0! A Square-0 needs to have 0 corner pieces and 4 edge pieces per layer. This is a 0-layer Square-1 (you can see the axis because the zero other layers don't block it from sight). Completely different.

 

[jms_gears1]

this was shopped i can tell by the pixels.

 

[Ville Seppänen]

this reminds me of mini-snake

 

[Andrew Ricci]

this reminds me of mini-snake

This reminds me of MM&P's repetitive 1x1 tutorials.

 

[Joker]

Oh dear...

I want to find it funny, but it's just too hard to laugh at this.

Agreed...and it was a plus 2 also

 

[Joemamma556]

I think it was speed up XD

 

[ChrisBird]

HE PLAYED THE VIDEO BACKWARDS
THERE IS NO WAY ANYONE CAN DO IT THAT FAST
OMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGGLOLHAXLAWL

In all seriousness: really? >_>

 

[oprah62]

+2

 

[~Phoenix Death~]

+2, brah

 

[Mr Cubism]

Haha, I like it!!

I want the scramble!!!

 

[Joker]

Haha, I like it!!

I want the scramble!!!

Read the description...

 

[04mucklowd]

I like you watch