Shouldn't be the second solve a DNF? He touched the puzzle after stopping the timer.
A similar case happened at East German Open 2010, when Tomasz Zolnowski did a 4x4x4 solve and stopped the timer with a U move left, then he solved it as a reflex move. I was judging him and I saw that he stopped with a +2 left and I gave him a DNF. Right after the solve I told Sébestien Auroux (the WCA delegate of the competition) and he told me, that if it was clear that he had a +2 only and I saw that for sure, it can be a +2, so I gave him a +2.
In my opinion this rule can be a bit subjective:
"A6e) The competitor must not touch or move the puzzle until the judge has inspected the puzzle. Penalty: disqualification of the solve."
It is the judge's responsibility to say that he has inspected the puzzle well or not. If he didn't pay that much attention, or it happened really quickly it's a DNF, but if the judge saw it well it can be a +2 or no penalty depending on the state of the cube at the moment the timer has been stopped.
Thoughts?
By the way, sorry for going off topic, Feliks, it's an amazing average, as usual!

It always seems that you are shaking a lot, or lock up but then you just finish the solve with a very nice time.