Is the war in Iraq really over?

the terrorists will probably move back in, take over parts we are trying to control, but since the combat troops aren't there anymore, they will probably kill more Americans. That or it really is over.
They weren't there before the US invaded, and they've never gone away since the invasion.
Really? then who killed all the Americans? 4000 Americans don't just die in a different country we just so happen to be fighting a war in.
what about Al-Qaeda?
 
Really? then who killed all the Americans? 4000 Americans don't just die in a different country we just so happen to be fighting a war in.
what about Al-Qaeda?
Please read what I said carefully.
I never said that there were never any terrorists in Iraq.
 
"they weren't there before we invaded"
why were there car bombs
Saddam was still in power, which was the problem. They were happy when we caught him and took him from power.

if we weren't there, he still would be, and he would still be threatening us with his weapons.

We did not go in there and attack nothing and wait for them to appear. They were always there.
 
the terrorists will probably move back in, take over parts we are trying to control, but since the combat troops aren't there anymore, they will probably kill more Americans. That or it really is over.
They weren't there before the US invaded, and they've never gone away since the invasion.
Really? then who killed all the Americans? 4000 Americans don't just die in a different country we just so happen to be fighting a war in.
what about Al-Qaeda?

You seem to be making the mistake of assuming that because someone revolts against a foreign invader who kills and tortures his countrymen while destroying his economy and way of life, he is a terrorist. Generally the proper term is militant or insurgent.
 
"they weren't there before we invaded"
why were there car bombs
Saddam was still in power, which was the problem. They were happy when we caught him and took him from power.

if we weren't there, he still would be, and he would still be threatening us with his weapons.

We did not go in there and attack nothing and wait for them to appear. They were always there.
People who became insurgents after the invasion were in Iraq before the invasion, yes. But Al-Qaeda was not present in Iraq till 2004 (That's when JTJ declared allegiance to Al-Qaeda). JTJ wasn't started until after the invasion.

EDIT: I agree with Ethan's above post as well. Mine has been edited.
 
Last edited:
There are some "terrorists" sure, but a vast majority of people that you describe as terrorists are defending their communities. I'd do the same if I was in their shoes. You probably wold too.
 
the Bush administration never claimed that that Iraq had anything to do with 9/11. The reason why we are in Afghanistan is because of 9/11.

No, the Bush administration did say that. Repeatedly.
 
Start citing sources instead of pulling crap out of your behind, all of you.

Sigh you can't just let me be happy and wait for him to be like, o yea you don't got no proof, so I can be like, O REALLY? WELL CHECK THIS OUT

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3119676.stm

And this

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A50679-2004Jun17.html

not to mention this

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_oet&address=358x1293

Google is a fun tool, isn't it?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/19/bush-continues-to-link-ir_n_92321.html
 
no, I was just hoping that the situation I desired would be allowed to happen
 
"Mr Bush has never directly accused the former Iraqi leader of having a hand in the attacks on New York and Washington"

it really doesn't matter if he associates them. It really does not. Al-Qaeda was in Iraq, they were the terrorist group that did the 9/11 attacks. They were in Iraq, and we were fighting them there. This does not mean that Saddam was part of it.
 
Back
Top