Chris Hardwick
----------------- 6x6x6: DNF DNF 42:44.01 DNS DNS
comment: Yay! Over three times faster than my first, and only other, successful solve!
What!! You mean to say that I did not win 6x6BLD this week???? Nice solve Chris!
This must be the first time ever in the weeklies that two persons solved a 6x6BLD.
At least with none of them being Mike! (I know he's busy with SQ1BLD )
Solution: L2 F' B' D2 L B' U F R F' R2 U R x' U2 R' U' R U' R' U' R U' L' U2 L U L' U' L2 y' R U R' U' F' Lw' U R' D2 R U' R' D2 R2 B
2x2: L2 F' B' D2 L (5/5)
F2L 2: B' U F R F' R2 U R (8/13)
F2L 3: x' U2 R' U' R U' R' U' R (8/21)
F2L 4: U' L' U2 L U L' U' L2 (8/29)
OLL: y' R U R' U' F' (5/34)
PLL: Lw' U R' D2 R U' R' D2 R2 B (10/44)
Chris Hardwick
----------------- 6x6x6: DNF DNF 42:44.01 DNS DNS
comment: Yay! Over three times faster than my first, and only other, successful solve!
What!! You mean to say that I did not win 6x6BLD this week???? Nice solve Chris!
This must be the first time ever in the weeklies that two persons solved a 6x6BLD.
At least with none of them being Mike! (I know he's busy with SQ1BLD )
I didn't realize how close our 6x6x6 solves were, and 7x7x7 solve! Nice solves to you as well! I never thought I would get into the 6x6 and 7x7, but practicing them seems to be helping with my 4x4x4. I hope it will also help with my 5x5x5. I'm going to practice only 6x6 and 7x7 next week, and then do my usual BLD practice in week #37. Hopefully it will help improve my 5x5x5, which is my goal! Mats, do you feel that practicing 6x6 and 7x7 BLD is helping for the smaller cubes for you?
And yes, Mike's SQ1 BLD is pretty epic in my opinion! Unless someone else learns his method for it, I think no one will be able to even come close to his times!
bloc 222 : L2 F2 R2 F L [5] [5]
fin croix : U2 B' R B2 [4] [9]
2eme paire : R U2 R' U B U B' [7] [16]
3eme paire R U2 R' U L U L' [7] [23]
4eme paire : U2 F U2 F2 U' F2 U' F' [8] [31]
OLL : R U R' U' R' F R F [8] [39]
PLL : [U'] U' S' U2 S U' R2 [8] [47]
Placement : U [1] [48]
4x4: 1:36.33[P], 1:38.33, (1:55.06[DP]), (1:33.84[P]), 1:50.58[OP] = 1:41.75 Comment: Where did that come from? Sq-1: 1:15.38, (1:48.65), 1:22.11, 1:18.84, (1:10.94) = 1:18.78 Comment: Just starting, I'll get a lot faster.