Pair (add your knowledge)

[Kenneth]

[wiki]Pair[/wiki]

Please fill in =)

Mabye [wiki]CE pair[/wiki] as title is better? Then we redirect to that...

 

[Rinfiyks]

Also, while you're at it. Please

 

[Kirjava]

What's to say?

 

[Kenneth]

What's to say?

I see your point but why not have a nice article?

For noobs and other unworthy people

 

[hawkmp4]

What's to say?

I see your point but why not have a nice article?

For noobs and other unworthy people

Why demand for someone else to do it?
Any reason why you can't?
A wiki is meant to be a community resource.

 

[Kenneth]

Also, while you're at it. Please

Yes, parity also =)

Many still think there is something as a "PLL-parity" but I don't know, I can solve it using two 3-cycles.

So we need to explain why that is a parity only to those who reduce to 3x3x3...

 

[Kenneth]

What's to say?

I see your point but why not have a nice article?

For noobs and other unworthy people

Why demand for someone else to do it?
Any reason why you can't?
A wiki is meant to be a community resource.

I can but I'm currently working on a diffrent page. (while doing that I placed a link to "pair" and found it was no article about it, a scandal!! =)

..But when thinking about it, I'm done with that diffrent page now so it will be "pair" next =)

 

[Kirjava]

I see your point but why not have a nice article?

Because there's nothing to say.

Please do not make placeholder pages.

 

[Kenneth]

I see your point but why not have a nice article?

Because there's nothing to say.

Can't agree...

I see your point but why not have a nice article?

Please do not make placeholder pages.

Can agree...

Many of those are not needed at all (2 "Sweden" ??, hope I did not do that =) but some should have an article (including people like Ron, Macky and others).

 

[hawkmp4]

So...like I said, if you want them, make them...

 

[Kirjava]

I see your point but why not have a nice article?

Because there's nothing to say.

Can't agree...

Anything that could be said should be said in the F2L article. "Pair" can mean a lot of things.

Please do not make placeholder pages.

Can agree...

Many of those are not needed at all (2 "Sweden" ??, hope I did not do that =) but some should have an article (including people like Ron, Macky and others).

You don't understand. When you make placeholder pages, the pages arn't included in that list when they should be.

 

[blade740]

Many still think there is something as a "PLL-parity" but I don't know, I can solve it using two 3-cycles.

This drives me crazy. "PLL parity" does exist. It is simply a parity in the permutation of the reduced edge pairs rather than in the permutation of individual edges.

 

[Kenneth]

I see your point but why not have a nice article?

Because there's nothing to say.

Can't agree...

Anything that could be said should be said in the F2L article. "Pair" can mean a lot of things.

Please do not make placeholder pages.

Can agree...

Many of those are not needed at all (2 "Sweden" ??, hope I did not do that =) but some should have an article (including people like Ron, Macky and others).

You don't understand. When you make placeholder pages, the pages arn't included in that list when they should be.

1; my point, I sometimes solve centre/edge pairs, I don't think F2L covers that...
2; ah, well, in this case I did it just to have a page to put a link to. and I WAS thinking of adding stuff as soon as I had time for it.

 

[Kirjava]

1; my point, I sometimes solve centre/edge pairs, I don't think F2L covers that...

Then put it in the RouxBy4/Columns article.

2; ah, well, in this case I did it just to have a page to put a link to. and I WAS thinking of adding stuff as soon as I had time for it.

You can link to pages that don't exist.

 

[Kenneth]

1; my point, I sometimes solve centre/edge pairs, I don't think F2L covers that...

Then put it in the RouxBy4/Columns article.

2; ah, well, in this case I did it just to have a page to put a link to. and I WAS thinking of adding stuff as soon as I had time for it.

You can link to pages that don't exist.

Sure, but in this case I wanted to add the stuff that only experieced users of the wiki knows how to add, like categorys, so it became a page that only lacked information, that I expected some bored speedcuber to be willing to add...

But you have probably scared most of them away now, they do not dare to argue with you I think ;P

And I spend the time I could use to write that article doing so when I know there is no idea, you already know what to think and would not change it for anything in the world


Why "RouxBy4"? as far as I know you do not accept to call anything but the pure version that name.

 

[Kirjava]

Sure, but in this case I wanted to add the stuff that only experieced users of the wiki knows how to add, like categorys, so it became a page that only lacked information, that I expected some bored speedcuber to be willing to add...

But you have probably scared most of them away now, they do not dare to argue with you I think ;P

I hope not. if they have a valid reason for making that page I'd like to hear it. I'm talking about adding unique content to it - a disambiguation page would be a valid use.

Why "RouxBy4"? as far as I know you do not accept to call anything but the pure version that name.

I disagree. This is just something that you've made up.

 

[Kenneth]

half a cross, 4 pairs

I refuse to accept that that is Roux.

I know you, you are only trying to be negative for no reason ar all, spam posting I say, some are getting banned for much less than what you are getting away with.

 

[Kirjava]

half a cross, 4 pairs

I refuse to accept that that is Roux.

My comment was made somewhat in jest. Regardless, it doesn't deserve labeling as a unique method.

If you really want to have this conversation, we can do.

I know you, you are only trying to be negative for no reason ar all, spam posting I say, some are getting banned for much less than what you are getting away with.

In that case, you're a moderator - why haven't you banned me?

 

[Swordsman Kirby]

Many still think there is something as a "PLL-parity" but I don't know, I can solve it using two 3-cycles.

This drives me crazy. "PLL parity" does exist. It is simply a parity in the permutation of the reduced edge pairs rather than in the permutation of individual edges.

Yeah, it's equivalent to saying that there is no parity on Sq-1. "I can solve it by leaving cubeshape."

 

[brunson]

I know you, you are only trying to be negative for no reason ar all, spam posting I say, some are getting banned for much less than what you are getting away with.

Not so much.