Johan444
Regular
you should be averaging around sub 15 before full oll. Unless you are done with full algorithm f2l, i do not think yo should learn full OLL. I hope this helps...
What will happen if you learn it too early?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
you should be averaging around sub 15 before full oll. Unless you are done with full algorithm f2l, i do not think yo should learn full OLL. I hope this helps...
you should be averaging around sub 15 before full oll. Unless you are done with full algorithm f2l, i do not think yo should learn full OLL. I hope this helps...
My advice is to never learn OLL.
Seriously?you should be averaging around sub 15 before full oll. Unless you are done with full algorithm f2l, i do not think yo should learn full OLL. I hope this helps...
Seriously?
His advice was to go for Roux instead of Fridrich. What's wrong with that?My advice is to never learn OLL.
How shocking to see Kirjava trying to be different from everyone else.
Dude, you are cool. You are so progressive and all!
:fp
No. Learn full OLL whenever you like.you should be averaging around sub 15 before full oll. Unless you are done with full algorithm f2l, i do not think yo should learn full OLL. I hope this helps...
Seriously?
My advice is to never learn OLL.
How shocking to see Kirjava trying to be different from everyone else.
Dude, you are cool. You are so progressive and all!
:fp
His advice was to go for Roux instead of Fridrich.
My advice is to never learn OLL.
How shocking to see Kirjava trying to be different from everyone else.
Dude, you are cool. You are so progressive and all!
:fp
I'm not /trying/ to be different, I just /am/. I genuinely think there are better alternatives to OLL.
I'm not /trying/ to be different, I just /am/. I genuinely think there are better alternatives to OLL.
Everybody is different, obviously. I am just annoyed by the way you always show your opposite opinion on most subjects without proposing any solution.
The question was when to learn OLL, not if he should learn it or not.
CLL/ELL and MGLS are unknown to a lot of cubers here.I'm not /trying/ to be different, I just /am/. I genuinely think there are better alternatives to OLL.
Everybody is different, obviously. I am just annoyed by the way you always show your opposite opinion on most subjects without proposing any solution.
I don't see how you can be annoyed at all. I make very valid points. Are you really stupid enough that I have to point out that CLL/ELL and MGLS exist? This community used to be smarter.
The question was when to learn OLL, not if he should learn it or not.
'Never' is a perfectly valid answer to 'When?'.
CLL/ELL and MGLS are unknown to a lot of cubers here.
Just put it in your signature or something, because repeating that Friedrich is not as good as Roux won't make your statement a reality, only an annoying repetition.
CLL/ELL and MGLS are unknown to a lot of cubers here.
CLL/ELL and MGLS are unknown to a lot of cubers here.
I know, it's pathetic.
Just put it in your signature or something, because repeating that Friedrich is not as good as Roux won't make your statement a reality, only an annoying repetition.
Wow. What the holy hell. I didn't state this at all. I specifically stated that this is actually not what I meant at all, and I've repeatedly stated in the past that it's impossible to know which method is better.
I'm sick of idiots taking something I've said, misinterpreting it wildly and calling me stupid because they have no idea what I'm actually saying.
I don't know how you can call it a repetition, since I've never even said it once.
Here's an idea; consider what I'm telling you because I can assure you that I know a hell of a lot more than you do. Maybe it's worth reading my posts multiple times incase you decided that I'd said something else on the first read through.
Or you can remain uneducated and ignorant by disagreeing with me.
CLL/ELL and MGLS are unknown to a lot of cubers here.
A lot of cubers here are stupid and lazy. Due to strong correlation and a lack of obvious lurking variables I am going to say there is strong evidence of causation.
CLL/ELL and MGLS are unknown to a lot of cubers here.
I know, it's pathetic.
Falling back on "you're being too serious" is a weak tactic employed by people with no rebuttal.
Falling back on "you're being too serious" is a weak tactic employed by people with no rebuttal.
Someone saddened because of the lack of knowledge about underground methods in the cubing community is definitely being too serious.
Whatever weak tactic used by such low-quality members do not change the fact too many times, you ''act'' like you know it all and you are a year ahead of us.
^MGLS/CLL/ELL are methods of controlling the OLL as you're finishing up fourth F2L pair, am I correct?
Never.
I will never learn full OLL. It requires far too much dedication and far too much time and effort than I feel like wasting on the cube. I would rather spend time learning the 4x4
To me, full OLL is unneccesary.
CLL/ELL and MGLS are unknown to a lot of cubers here.
I know, it's pathetic.
Rather than riding on your tall horse and judging people, why not rather INFORM people and spread knowledge?
There is not one, not ONE single good tutorial on MGLS on YouTube on this that makes sense.
Instead if being an elitistic a-hole and overall douchebag why don't you instead show us understanding giving us a chance to understand what it is.
Judging people is a hell of a lot easier than spending a single braincell on understanding.
MGLS is a 2 step method for OLL/last slot^MGLS/CLL/ELL are methods of controlling the OLL as you're finishing up fourth F2L pair, am I correct?
CLL/ELL and MGLS are unknown to a lot of cubers here.
I know, it's pathetic.
Rather than riding on your tall horse and judging people, why not rather INFORM people and spread knowledge?
There is not one, not ONE single good tutorial on MGLS on YouTube on this that makes sense.
Instead if being an elitistic a-hole and overall douchebag why don't you instead show us understanding giving us a chance to understand what it is.
Judging people is a hell of a lot easier than spending a single braincell on understanding.
Falling back on "you're being too serious" is a weak tactic employed by people with no rebuttal.
Someone saddened because of the lack of knowledge about underground methods in the cubing community is definitely being too serious.
Serious or not, anyone who thinks lack of knowledge isn't a bad thing is a moron.
Lack of knowledge is not something we want. But lack of knowledge in more or less useful subjects is not something bad. At all.
Go learn the Wiki if you really think what you just said, because it's deeply wrong.
Whatever weak tactic used by such low-quality members do not change the fact too many times, you ''act'' like you know it all and you are a year ahead of us.
It's not an act.
That's why I used this ponctuation. I'm french and my english is far from being perfect.
^MGLS/CLL/ELL are methods of controlling the OLL as you're finishing up fourth F2L pair, am I correct?
You can find more information on the wiki.