Your U*20 speed?

[Hadley4000]

3.63.

4.5x with U' 20

 

[xXzaKerXx]

average of 5: 4.25
Best: 3.83

i did U' because i'm a lefty

oops sorry i didn't notice the "right index finger" part. does it still count?

 

[TheCubeElite]

After about 60 trys, I started out at 4.xx, then got down to avg 3.5. Then I got to the point where I was at 3.01 through 3.05. Finally, I got 2.97, sub-3!

 

[Faz]

Best time was 3.63

 

[Robert-Y]

I'd like to see what Breandan can do....

 

[Lucas Garron]

After about 60 trys, I started out at 4.xx, then got down to avg 3.5. Then I got to the point where I was at 3.01 through 3.05. Finally, I got 2.97, sub-3!

You're probably doing it wrong. Do people even read anything?

 

[Kian]

I think, judging from the times, that is likely not a good indicator of anything. It was a very interesting experiment, but it seems that there is not a good correlation between solving time and/or tps and times in this experiment.

RUR'U' might be a better thing to test, I'm not sure. The best would probably be taking times and figuring out tps and averaging it out, but that's much more labor intensive.

 

[Edward_Lin]

best is 3.75. using my middle finger i can get 2.5

 

[sz35]

3.59

 

[Lucas Garron]

I think, judging from the times, that is likely not a good indicator of anything.

I'd say it's a very good indicator. Not of something more general, but of how fast you can relocate your finger for a new turn.

Stefan, what was your point?

 

[Kian]

I think, judging from the times, that is likely not a good indicator of anything./QUOTE]
I'd say it's a very good indicator. Not of something more general, but of how fast you can relocate your finger for a new turn.

Stefan, what was your point?

OK, fair enough. I meant to say that it doesn't seem to be a good indicator of anything relating to actual solving.

 

[Enter]

5.56 with rightindex finger and 3.40 with leftindex finger

 

[tanapak1]

2.80

 

[Lucas Garron]

I think, judging from the times, that is likely not a good indicator of anything.

I'd say it's a very good indicator. Not of something more general, but of how fast you can relocate your finger for a new turn.

Stefan, what was your point?

OK, fair enough. I meant to say that it doesn't seem to be a good indicator of anything relating to actual solving.

Yeah, because you never relocate fingers during actual solving.

 

[shelley]

I think, judging from the times, that is likely not a good indicator of anything.

I'd say it's a very good indicator. Not of something more general, but of how fast you can relocate your finger for a new turn.

Stefan, what was your point?

OK, fair enough. I meant to say that it doesn't seem to be a good indicator of anything relating to actual solving.

Yeah, because you never relocate fingers during actual solving.

Who relocates 20 times in quick succession?

 

[Lucas Garron]

I think, judging from the times, that is likely not a good indicator of anything.

I'd say it's a very good indicator. Not of something more general, but of how fast you can relocate your finger for a new turn.

Stefan, what was your point?

OK, fair enough. I meant to say that it doesn't seem to be a good indicator of anything relating to actual solving.

Yeah, because you never relocate fingers during actual solving.

Who relocates 20 times in quick succession?

No one, during a speedsolve. PLL time attacks are useless, too, right?

 

[TMOY]

Got 3.69, with the 50mm cube I'm currently using as my main speedsolve cube.

 

[Meisen]

After 20 tries, my best was 3.57.

I do believe sub 3 is possible. Not for me, granted, but for some people on this forum that should be quite possible.

I don't know about sub 2 though. I doubt it.

 

[Radu]

4.11 on an F2

 

[Novriil]

4.15 :/ It's so creepy to turn that way..