gogozerg
Member
Hi Kenneth,
Your posts are interesting.
That would be great, if you could achieve good times with such a method. Hang on!
When I considered this strategy, I gave up because of 2 things:
1) Building 4 pairs as the first step is a tough task. Fast recognition is a problem, and when an edge you need is located at DL or DR, it induces unpleasant moves (see what I mean?).
2) Learning all sequences needed for step 2 (6x8x3 minus identical cases and symmetries) is just too much for me. But people who can learn so many sequences could make the "last 4 corners" step more productive, as you propose (or make it prepare final edges orientiation).
Gilles.
Your posts are interesting.
That would be great, if you could achieve good times with such a method. Hang on!
When I considered this strategy, I gave up because of 2 things:
1) Building 4 pairs as the first step is a tough task. Fast recognition is a problem, and when an edge you need is located at DL or DR, it induces unpleasant moves (see what I mean?).
2) Learning all sequences needed for step 2 (6x8x3 minus identical cases and symmetries) is just too much for me. But people who can learn so many sequences could make the "last 4 corners" step more productive, as you propose (or make it prepare final edges orientiation).
Gilles.