Have you ever tried teaching someone how to solve a cube?

Rook

Regular
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
107
Location
Canada, A?
Hi all,

So the other day I was trying to teach my friend how to solve a 2x2 using LBL. I didn't really want to introduce cubing notation because I thought he would get confused. Maybe I should have though...

I found it extremely annoying because 1) My friend is extremely impatient and 2) I had to speak to him like "Turn this side this way, then that side the other way, then the first side counterclockwise, etc." :( Eventually I gave up on teaching him (he didn't seem to want to "waste his time" apparently). I was thinking to myself, How the heck would I teach him to solve a 3x3 if he can't be bothered to solve a 2x2? :fp

anyway, have you ever tried teaching a friend/family member how to solve a cube?
 
Yes I have and it worked he solves it in 1 minutes 30 seconds now.

I teached him 3x3x3 the way to tried teaching him.
 
I taught a person how to solve a 3x3. It took a long time just teaching him the cross.

He found out the cross easy for me.
and when I teached him the step were you have to do R U' L' U R' U' L.
I told him to remember raisng and lowering the bars.
 
I have taught 3 people. The most recent was the easiest, because he already knew how to make a layer, and knew how the cube worked. Then I taught him notation, and he understood it. I am now teaching him advanced F2L.

I am also in the process of teaching my brother.
 
i walked my cousin through solving it by saying like the right face clockwise bcuz he didnt understand notation i showed him the cross like 3 weeks ago and he can do the cross in like 20 seconds but thats as far i got
 
I've taught over half a dozen and I try and have abunch of loner cubes to give them. It seems liek success is mostly based on dedication and not getting frustrated and giving up.

A lot of people are intimidated by the cross. I explain it's the hardest part because it involves the most thinking.

EDIT: another important thing to explain is that the cube is not 54 stickers. it's 26 cubies of which only 20 move. the cube is really a puzzle with 20 pieces that have to be put in the right place with the right orientation
 
Last edited:
I have taught between 30 and 40 people now, including several 7 or 8 year olds (at a school where I teach) as well as a guy in his 70s. For people from their mid teens to 30s it rarely takes me much more than 2 hours to go through the entire process anymore.

I am always perplexed by people who make statements like "I tried to teach my friend, but he couldn't understand," "My brother was too stupid to even do a cross," et cetera. If someone you are trying to teach the cube doesn't get it (and they are sincerely trying), it is 100% your fault for being a terrible teacher.
 
I hate to break this to you, but the energy in a teaching situation comes from the teacher. If the teacher is impatient or frustrated by the student, this creates a tense and frustrated atmosphere, and the student will not want to learn. Sometimes the student is very impatient, even when you're trying to be relaxed, but if you just stay relaxed and maybe take breaks and things, it can help with this.

You have to realize a couple of very important things when teaching cubing:
1) What is obvious and trivial to you is completely new and foreign to this person

2) You understand how a 2x2x2 cube physically works, that it is made up of 8 corner pieces, each with 3 possible orientations. The person you are teaching will almost always view the cube as 2x2x6 = 24 stickers that appear to move around the cube. The very first thing I do when teaching a 3x3x3 (this would be more difficult for 2x2x2) is to take a separate cube and disassemble it so that the learner can see how it works.

3) Notation is absolutely not necessary when teaching. In fact, every single person I have taught to solve by using notation does not now remember how to solve the cube at all. Everyone I have taught to solve using intuition can still solve it today :-)

--------------

Be very patient with new learners. Consider also that they are trying to go from knowing essentially nothing about the cube to being a solver in one sitting. Ask yourself if you learned how to solve in just one sitting?

Teaching cubing is fun, but it is also takes a lot of patience and can be difficult at times. Don't give up on your friend! Keep trying, he/she will eventually get it! Seeing someone solve the cube for the very first time, and seeing their reaction, is one of the best feelings! I'd argue that it's even more intense than almost any blindfold solve or relay!

Chris
 
I taught my brother the 2x2. He had that patients, but it had its limits. I could only teach him one step at a time.

First day, I showed him how to pair together the first 3 corners. Next time, we went onto the 4th corner. Now came the last layer. I tried to teach him the notation, but I thought,
"Come on, it would be much simpler to just teach him the moves."
So that's what I did. He got the algorithm for switching the corners down okay, but the hard part in this step is just teaching him how to apply it.
"Okay, if the mismatched corners are opposite from each other, do the algorithm once. If they're adjacent to each other, rotate the top layer so they're only 1 corner is in the right place. Then do the algorithm once or twice."
I took him a long time to get this down! Now that the hard part was out of the way, we went onto the last step, orienting the corners.
"Okay, simply do the moves like this & repeat to yourself while you're doing them, 'down, left, up, right'. You do that algorithm 2 or 4 times for each corner."

It probably took about a month, learning off & on, before he finally got it down! Although if I asked him now, he would probably needed to be reminded of a few things.
 
every single person I have taught to solve by using notation does not now remember how to solve the cube at all. Everyone I have taught to solve using intuition can still solve it today

Hey Chris, by teaching "intuitively," do you mean that you actually taught an intuitive method (blockbuilding, commutators, etc.) or that you taught algorithms in an intuitive, structural manner (i.e., tracking pieces, explaining things in terms of movement away from and towards you, patterns, etc.)?
 
I've been trying to teach certain people.
I've experimented with notation versus intuition, and only the beginner's method.

Notation seems to be the place where students have the most difficulty. I think their perspective of F R U R U' F' is "Okay, so the front side, um, which way, this way? Um, idk."
What people think about notation is you need to turn a certain side a certain way, but they forget how to turn it or they turn U clockwise and D ccw just because they think U and D look alike.
By them doing this, they need to unlearn it. The hard part about unlearning something is realizing that it indeed was WRONG.
On the other hand, by using intuitive solving, people have a better understanding of the cube, its parts, how they work, and how to recognize what to do and how to solve it.

I know all of you remember this:
Beginner’s method. 1st layer was solved. Now for middle edges.
If you learned it with notation, you know the algorithms U R U’ R’ U’ F’ U F and U’ L’ U L U F U’ F’ to solve the middle edges.
Intuitively, it would be:
Move the edge out of the way,
Slot up,
Move the edge back,
Slot down,
Move the pair out of the way on the other side,
Slot up,
Pair in,
Slot down.
Sure, it takes some time for you to think about it, but when you’re showing it to another person, they grasp the concept better and can remember the moves as their perception and mnemonic systems allow them to.
Intuitive is the way to go, and don’t forget to explain how all of the pieces work.

Don’t forget to refresh your linens!
--Ranzha V E
 
every single person I have taught to solve by using notation does not now remember how to solve the cube at all. Everyone I have taught to solve using intuition can still solve it today

Hey Chris, by teaching "intuitively," do you mean that you actually taught an intuitive method (blockbuilding, commutators, etc.) or that you taught algorithms in an intuitive, structural manner (i.e., tracking pieces, explaining things in terms of movement away from and towards you, patterns, etc.)?

I teach notation immediatley, but I don't stand over them whilst they are learning. I teach notation, walk them through a couple of solves saying every move in terms of R, U'. Then I run through how to do cross. Then I show them the algorithms, what the algorithms do and when to use them.

Then I write the algorithms down, giving them descriptive names (Left slot, edge matcher, corner rotate etc) and leave them to it for a bit. If they have a problem they'll come and ask me.
 
Hey Chris, by teaching "intuitively," do you mean that you actually taught an intuitive method (blockbuilding, commutators, etc.) or that you taught algorithms in an intuitive, structural manner (i.e., tracking pieces, explaining things in terms of movement away from and towards you, patterns, etc.)?

I teach Joël's commutator last layer for beginners, only I never tell them that why they are using are "commutators" or any of the theory behind the cube. I have tried explaining how commutators work, and usually it does not add to making it easier to teach them.

So in a sense I show them how to use commutators, but they maybe don't realize that is what they are using. Still, commutators are very intuitive and you can understand what you are doing to the cube. I basically explain a commutator to a beginner learner as a "destroy and restore" since this is really what a commutator does on a basic level. You destroy most of the cube in order to affect one piece, then you undo what you destroyed on another piece, and this does something useful.

The only true "algorithm" that I can't seem to find any other way to teach is to orient edges on the LL. The two algs are:
1) F R U R' U' F'
2) F U R U' R' F'

I have tried to teach these by explaining what is happening with the blocks, and how the pieces move "away" and "toward" each other but none of these methods work very well for helping people to remember much later on, assuming I am not around to give them hints if they forget. I have found that what works best for these two algs in particular is to use an anecdotal story to remember them.

For example:
the algorithm F R U R' U' F' I would teach like this.

"Make sure that you see the letter "C" or a small "L" with the top layer edges, and spin the cube so that they are at the back, and on the left."

- At this step I am just having them put the good edges at UB and UL.

"The piece on the front here (I point to UF) is flipped, and he's mean and he's unhappy about this. He's a really impatient piece, and wants to hit somebody, or knock somebody out of the way. First this guy slides down on the right (we do the F turn here). Now this guy sees the piece on the right side here (I point to UR) and he gets excited and just meanly knocks the top right guy out of the way here (we do the turn R)."

So in order to get them to remember to to the F R of the algorithm, I tell them that the UF piece is angry, and wants to knock the closest possible neighbor out of the way, or to hit the closest possible neighbor.

"The guy that was on the top right (the piece that was at UR) is now on the back here (is now in BR). This piece is a much more friendly piece, in fact this piece is a team player. Think of wrestling, this piece is going to tag team the 'flipped piece' (the only remaining flipped LL edge, now at UB). So we spin the top here (we do the turn U here) so that the 'nice piece' can tag team this flipped piece. Now that they're lined up, let's tag team them (we do the turn R' here)."

So the LL edge piece that was at UR, and got bumped to BR, "tag teams" or "tags" the other flipped LL edge at UB by doing the turns U R'.

"The last piece here that needs to go in the top is now on the front here (it is the R sticker of the FR piece right now). This piece fills in the last spot on the top layer that is empty. This empty spot is over here (point to UL), so let's just spin the top here and put the empty slot on the front (put it at UF - and here we do the turn U'). Now this last piece on the side (the piece at FR) just steps into the empty space (we do the turn F' here).

---------------

This explanation is very awkward to write over the internet, but it is very easy to show in person and usually people remember stories involving people rather than abstract blocks or just a string of notation. You have to also remember that I usually only teach elementary or middle school kids how to solve, so perhaps this wouldn't be as necessary for an adult learner, but I think it would still make it very easy to remember.

So in short:

1) Try to teach commutators and intuitive things, but never explain the theory of why it works on anything more than a very basic level (unless the person asks).

2) If you must teach an algorithm do it anecdotally by turning it into a story about people with different personalities. This tends to work very well with kids, and I would assume with adults too.

Chris
 
Last edited:
taught my dad the 2x2x2 and he can solve it in a minute, and my friend who i taught the 3x3x3 to can do that in slightly under a minute. the hardest part of teaching is teaching the actual intuitive part of cubing that eventually becomes natural, and the alg's.
 
Mhm, I guess I did get pretty annoyed when my friend was asking simple (well, for a cuber) questions :o Then again, I've never been good at teaching/explaining. I should go slower if someone asks me to teach them.
 
I taught my friend the other week.

I also taught my girlfriend, then she broke up with me about a month later. She still cubes. I WANT MY KNOWLEDGE BACK!

Man, that must suck! She was just a knowledgedigger...:(

Yeaah well. What can you do.

I suppose it's alright because I still get to see her, even if its not in that way.
 
Back
Top