Whats a good site to learn fridrich

[Rubiks Landon]

Does anyone know of a good site to learn fridrich...or a site that has f2l algs LL algs??

 

[adragast]

if you are looking for algs, you could consider cubewhiz for example...

 

[FU]

cubestation has all the basic 119 algorithms you need for fridrich.

 

[Leo]

I like cubefreak.net, has algs that seem to be suited for my hands and very good explanations and tips for everything.

 

[Erik]

cubestation has all the basic 119 algorithms you need for fridrich.

-sigh- here we go again....
let me rephrase what I said about 1000 times now?
'Learning F2L intuitive rather than stupidly learning algorithms is better and faster'
thank you..

 

[AvGalen]

Erik, that depends on the person!

Some people just like learning the algorithms and not everyone is good at finding them intuitively.

But I agree with you anyway.

 

[Rubiks Landon]

thanks are there any good f2l videos or anything im not very good at learning by algs

 

[pjk]

Check this post here, read through it and it should help answer your questions. Good luck and have fun.

 

[Johannes91]

Learning F2L intuitive rather than stupidly learning algorithms is better and faster

Wrong! It's slow and painful!

... and not everyone is good at finding them intuitively.

Precisely because they don't try. It takes some work to become good.

 

[FU]

cubestation has all the basic 119 algorithms you need for fridrich.

-sigh- here we go again....
let me rephrase what I said about 1000 times now?
'Learning F2L intuitive rather than stupidly learning algorithms is better and faster'
thank you..

Actually I do F2L intuitively, but isn't it standard to say that fridrich requires 119 basic algorithms, rather than 78 basic algorithms for last layer only?

 

[Harris Chan]

The F2L algos are short, once you look at certain algos that are grouped efficiently, you can kind of get the idea of how they work. Yah, there's nothing wrong with just learning the algos, but after a while you should be about to know how they work, that way you can adapt it for the more advance cases later on. F2L algos aren't like LL algos exactly (well it's debatable, you could argue that some LL is logical).

Yah..http://www.freespaces.com/jasa86/intro_f2l_intro.htm

 

[Rubiks Landon]

Thanks hey i have the f2l down pretty good what should i start first pll or oll... i know i sound like a noob (i am one) but how do i read pll plz dont laugh at me im a noob

 

[Rubiks Landon]

Thanks hey i have the f2l down pretty good what should i start first pll or oll... i know i sound like a noob (i am one) but how do i read pll plz dont laugh at me im a noob

f2l needs a bit of work on a couple of situations but still i caught f2l fast it was pretty easy

 

[AvGalen]

First learn enough of OLL and PLL so you can always solve the OLL in 2 steps and the PLL in 2 steps. This requires 10 OLL's and 6 PLL's.

Then learn the rest of the PLL's.
Then learn the rest of the OLL's.

 

[jackolanternsoup]

Much better to learn it intuitively. much much. it's not so complicated and you shouldn't have to memorise 119 algorithms.. that's just too many..

 

[AvGalen]

119 algorithms is to many for learning F2L. That is why 119 is actually the number of algorithms for F2L + OLL + PLL.

If you can also do OLL and PLL intuitively (and fast) everyone here will be very impressed.

 

[pajodaep]

cubeloop.com best f2l ever!