CuBeOrDiE
Veteran
are there anymore things to say about my method?
[Unofficial] 21.5 second solve(3x3)
- Thread starter CuBeOrDiE
- Start date
piemaster
Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2009
- Messages
- 310
Nice! I just came across this today, while searching randomly, good luck with it~!
xXdaveXsuperstarXx
Regular
Nice fingertricks!
Why do you need so much reassurance? We have all said what we thought and thats that.
tfkscores
Regular
Honestly your method is trash and kinda a knockoff other methods. If it works for you it works for you we shouldn't judge. Can we just end this complaining about it? If you start averaging sub 10 with it or getting sub 20 solves than I might be impressed. Your method is kinda unconventional and you should just use petrus or fredrich.
miniGOINGS
Legend
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2009
- Messages
- 3,049
I still have no idea how your "method" works. Could you explain it, like without a video for me.
bwatkins
Regular
- Joined
- May 7, 2009
- Messages
- 226
Did you use computer scrambles in your video? i believe you said before your first f2l solve "...so, it looks fairly scrambled..." If you are so concerned on PROVING your method "isn't crap," then meet everyone's requests when they ask you to do something. You seem to be avoiding what people "want" to see. In fact im not sure if we want to see it or not, it just keeps showing up in threads here and there when you accomplish something you think is proof of effectiveness.
I'm not saying your method is bad, it does seem like less effective petrus, but if it works for you then use it. Perfect it and blow us all out of the water with some sick times. Quit worrying what we all think and just enjoy you solves.
jcuber
Veteran
It's basically Petrus F2L without EO.
jcuber
Veteran
I hope you are being sarcastic...
tfkscores
Regular
me to...
xXdaveXsuperstarXx
Regular
I'm being sarcastic in an odd context that would not seemingly fit.
miniGOINGS
Legend
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2009
- Messages
- 3,049
Oh goodies.
edd5190
Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2007
- Messages
- 339
- Location
- Seattle, Washington
- WCA ID
- 2007ADSU01
- YouTube
- Visit Channel
I've said this before. People respond because they want to, not because you beg them to. Even when they do respond, you argue with or the opinions that you dislike. My opinion is that this method sucks. It's not even your method, because it's certainly been thought of before. The cube's been around for many years; it's almost impossible for this method not to have been thought of. There's a reason that no one uses this method. However, I do congratulate you for doing relatively well with this method and your determination (read: hard-headedness).
First, you build a 1x2x3 line, then insert edges to make it a 1x2x3 block, then insert edges to expand to a 2x2x3 block. Solve the rest of the F2L, then OLL and PLL.
I'd say more, but I don't want to turn this thread into a flame war again...
E
Ethan Rosen
Guest
miniGOINGS
Legend
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2009
- Messages
- 3,049
The first part sounds pretty much like how I make my first Roux block sometimes.
piemaster
Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2009
- Messages
- 310
You guys don't need to be so cold. Just leave him be.
RampageCuber
Regular
Well, hes not breaking any records with that method.
puzzlemaster
Veteran
He simply asked questions in the beginning, received answers, chose the answers he liked, and then begged for more compliments. The method is inefficient and watered down petrus without the part that makes it fast at the end lol. He watered down the first part, skipped the part that makes petrus faster, and then expected everyone to love it. We aren't being cold. We are simply showing him what we think.
CuBeOrDiE
Veteran
Did you use computer scrambles in your video? i believe you said before your first f2l solve "...so, it looks fairly scrambled..." If you are so concerned on PROVING your method "isn't crap," then meet everyone's requests when they ask you to do something. You seem to be avoiding what people "want" to see. In fact im not sure if we want to see it or not, it just keeps showing up in threads here and there when you accomplish something you think is proof of effectiveness.
I'm not saying your method is bad, it does seem like less effective petrus, but if it works for you then use it. Perfect it and blow us all out of the water with some sick times. Quit worrying what we all think and just enjoy you solves.
Didn't you watch the vid? Computer scrambles made the video 13 minutes. I couldn't possibly use them.
4Chan
Premium Member
Did you use computer scrambles in your video? i believe you said before your first f2l solve "...so, it looks fairly scrambled..." If you are so concerned on PROVING your method "isn't crap," then meet everyone's requests when they ask you to do something. You seem to be avoiding what people "want" to see. In fact im not sure if we want to see it or not, it just keeps showing up in threads here and there when you accomplish something you think is proof of effectiveness.
I'm not saying your method is bad, it does seem like less effective petrus, but if it works for you then use it. Perfect it and blow us all out of the water with some sick times. Quit worrying what we all think and just enjoy you solves.
Didn't you watch the vid? Computer scrambles made the video 13 minutes. I couldn't possibly use them.
Theres this magical thing called video editing, or practice.
You can speed up scrambles.
Similar threads
