proof that my f2l method isn't crap: F2L solve-15.55 seconds

[CuBeOrDiE]

never! im a stubborn ass

That's all that this thread proves...Waffle is right. This'll eventually just become petrus...

never! im a stubborn ass

 

[brunson]

I just went through your old postings.

You have four threads about your method. You have 72 postings in this thread and 42 in the original video posting thread. How that adds up to more than your actual post count, I don't know, but I just went back and recounted. Maybe it's because I can see deleted posts. You have at least six postings about your method in other threads, too.

I want to ask you this question: Do you think you are contributing more signal or more noise to this forum?

 

[puzzlemaster]

I just went through your old postings.

You have four threads about your method. You have 72 postings in this thread and 42 in the original video posting thread. How that adds up to more than your actual post count, I don't know, but I just went back and recounted. Maybe it's because I can see deleted posts. You have at least six postings about your method in other threads, too.

I want to ask you this question: Do you think you are contributing more signal or more noise to this forum?

neither... he's "a stubborn ass"

 

[Ethan Rosen]

difficult to think up quickly in only a few seconds

That's because you suck at them

 

[brunson]

Let's not be mean, he's just a kid. I think this thread will end up being closed.