proof that my f2l method isn't crap: F2L solve-15.55 seconds

[xXdaveXsuperstarXx]

How many algorithms are you willing to learn?

 

[CuBeOrDiE]

Learn 1 algorithm every 3 days. That's how I learned fridrich!

nahr I'm just to lazy-28 algs is enough for me...plus that horrible 4x4 parity...

 

[CuBeOrDiE]

How many algorithms are you willing to learn?

50 max...I'm concidering COLL...

Oh and do you live in ontario?

 

[daeyoungyoon]

It is less efficient at FM but it isn't worse for speed. Remember it is supposed to be SIMPLER than Petrus. But I respect your view point and don't consider you a hater. Out of 10 stars, how many would you give my method for SPEED?

Petrus is a speedsolving method if you didn't know. And I fail to see how this method would be faster than Petrus.

 

[CuBeOrDiE]

no edge orientation, simpler, no block building, one cube rotation max

 

[CuBeOrDiE]

but don't forget my method is sort of like petrus...

-and I know this is random, but I just did 3 solves and two of them were 25.64 seconds NO JOKE!

 

[JLarsen]

It is less efficient at FM but it isn't worse for speed. Remember it is supposed to be SIMPLER than Petrus. But I respect your view point and don't consider you a hater. Out of 10 stars, how many would you give my method for SPEED?

Petrus is a speedsolving method if you didn't know. And I fail to see how this method would be faster than Petrus.

It isn't.

Anyway. I'll give Petrus a 9/10 for speed, and based on that I'll give this a 6 or 7. Basically the lack of efficiency makes its potential very low. Now if it was simpler, and only slightly less efficient (like ZZ /Fridrich compared to Roux/Petrus), than I would think more of the method.

I think this method would have more potential if you fixed bad edges after making your 2x2x3, and then solved the rest Petrus style. Than I would give this method a 7 or 8. Then maybe once you got comfortable making a 2x2x3 without simplifying it, you could just move on to pure Petrus, orrrrrrr ZZ. Actually I highly recommend ZZ to you since you like making a 2x2x3 but you don't like pure block building.

 

[jms_gears1]

Petrus is a speedsolving method if you didn't know. And I fail to see how this method would be faster than Petrus.

Ok enough of these posts about how its not better than this or that. At least the kids idea was halfway original versus everyone elses "original methods".

Everyone here who has hated on COD, i think its fair to say, uses a block style method. This method is a simplified Block building method and could get others into Block building easily.

So stop with the put downs-ish comments and maybe help with constructive comments?

P.S. sorry daey not an attack on you just your post was the latest..

 

[JLarsen]

Look above you. I thought I did a very nice job. =]

 

[xXdaveXsuperstarXx]

Hey! He could keep his method and call it. A beginners block building method. It makes for an easy transition into petrus.

 

[CuBeOrDiE]

Petrus is a speedsolving method if you didn't know. And I fail to see how this method would be faster than Petrus.

Ok enough of these posts about how its not better than this or that. At least the kids idea was halfway original versus everyone elses "original methods".

Everyone here who has hated on COD, i think its fair to say, uses a block style method. This method is a simplified Block building method and could get others into Block building easily.

So stop with the put downs-ish comments and maybe help with constructive comments?

P.S. sorry daey not an attack on you just your post was the latest..

Thanks man LURV this comment! You've definately hit the nail on the head. This method is simpler and AlMOST as fast as petrus(in my case, faster)

 

[CuBeOrDiE]

Let's have a poll:who's for calling this method''A beginners block building method'' say I!

edit:nobody?

 

[xXdaveXsuperstarXx]

Actually, that's not a bad idea . I!

 

[jms_gears1]

Look above you. I thought I did a very nice job. =]

yea i was about to post and say LIKE THIS. xP

Petrus is a speedsolving method if you didn't know. And I fail to see how this method would be faster than Petrus.

Ok enough of these posts about how its not better than this or that. At least the kids idea was halfway original versus everyone elses "original methods".

Everyone here who has hated on COD, i think its fair to say, uses a block style method. This method is a simplified Block building method and could get others into Block building easily.

So stop with the put downs-ish comments and maybe help with constructive comments?

P.S. sorry daey not an attack on you just your post was the latest..

Thanks man LURV this comment! You've definately hit the nail on the head. This method is simpler and AlMOST as fast as petrus(in my case, faster)

lol yea no problem, im tired of seeing the bashings people get on the forums. Its pointless and 99% of the people wouldnt dream of doing it in thier face. To be honest i think that no matter how stupid someones idea is (not implying yours is i like it), instead of thrashing them with words (sounded cooler then bashing), we should say things more along the lines of, "This Is basically just fridrich disquised as roux" or something..

 

[CuBeOrDiE]

thnxs!

-message was to short so im writing this

 

[jms_gears1]

Let's have a poll:who's for calling this method''A beginners block building method'' say I!

edit:nobody?

Nobody? I!!!

 

[CuBeOrDiE]

any more I's?

 

[CuBeOrDiE]

2 more and i'm changing it

 

[xXdaveXsuperstarXx]

Just post the poll.

 

[jms_gears1]

any more I's?

sorry i need my other one