D
Deleted member 2864
Guest
it's all your choice. Stick with it if your times are dropping and leave it if and check other methods if you're stuck.
That is just a really wrong statement. This year the 333-avg WR has been broken a couple of times by different speedcubers that all used Fridrich.I would recommend sticking with Petrus. Not many people use it, well compared to Fridrich, and people are getting faster and faster with it, whilst Fridrich is leveling off kind of.
Or you could just use PetrusIt probably has the most potential for a 3x3 method.
Absolutely agreed. The minute I get back from Nationals, I'm switching.
Or you could just use PetrusIt probably has the most potential for a 3x3 method.
Absolutely agreed. The minute I get back from Nationals, I'm switching.
Or you could just use PetrusIt probably has the most potential for a 3x3 method.
Absolutely agreed. The minute I get back from Nationals, I'm switching.
or you can just use Roux
I know...I use it
In terms of fun
Roux>Fridrich
Oh Okay I thought you were saying to make 1x2x3 blocks, and then turn it into an f2l when you said insert 2 edges.
Oh Okay I thought you were saying to make 1x2x3 blocks, and then turn it into an f2l when you said insert 2 edges.
No you're correct as to what I meant. Instead of doing: first 1x2x3 block, second 1x2x3 block, COLL, Orient remaining edges, Solve UR and UL edges, Solve remaining edges.
I thought of doing: 1x2x3 block on left, 1x2x3 block on right, Fill in DF and DB edges to form an F2L, OLL, PLL to finish cube. As I said multiple times though I am positive that someone else has thought of this before.
Oh Okay I thought you were saying to make 1x2x3 blocks, and then turn it into an f2l when you said insert 2 edges.
No you're correct as to what I meant. Instead of doing: first 1x2x3 block, second 1x2x3 block, COLL, Orient remaining edges, Solve UR and UL edges, Solve remaining edges.
I thought of doing: 1x2x3 block on left, 1x2x3 block on right, Fill in DF and DB edges to form an F2L, OLL, PLL to finish cube. As I said multiple times though I am positive that someone else has thought of this before.
Then I don't see what I said wrong in the first place. Miscommunication...
Puzzle master, I really don't see how edge orientation steps are bad. In both Petrus and Roux all I ever seem to see is people saying that EO is garbage, and that we should just do Fridrich instead. The point of Roux is to reduce the cube to M and U, and the purpose of Petrus, to reduce the R and U. Those are the fastest parts in both methods! It's the reason we make these pretty blocks, they reward us further on down the road in our solves. I actually think OLL/PLL would be slower.