puzzlemaster
Veteran
I might go because 1/3 of the events I do is in the comp
1/3? you're only doing 4x4.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I might go because 1/3 of the events I do is in the comp
I think this is the first competition without a 3x3x3
Perhaps take the sum of the ranks of cubes 4-7 for each person, and whoever has the lowest sum wins. (Just a suggestion)Out of curiosity, what's it gonna say on the WCA homepage and speedcubing.com about who "wins" Big Cubes Summer 2009?
Apparently Dan liked my bigcubes comp idea...![]()
Uhh no. The idea of a bigcubes only comp has been thrown around for months and months. Dan just finally stopped being lazy and organized it.
You guys don't get the point of this do you? The point is that 3x3 sucks and it brings in all the noobs. All the good cubers want the chance to have a competition without the annoyance of all the idiots, and to have a jolly good time while they're at it. Also, jcuber, I can assure you this idea was not yours at all. I recall discussing such a possibility almost a year ago.
Ouch, need some ice for that burn.
I felt that over here.
It must be winter 'cus that was a cold snap!
That musta hurt so bad yo daddy felt it.
EDIT: Any thought to the other part of my original post? (another comp like this perhaps in the fall or something) Is this just a one-time deal? If so, I may consider organizing something like this...with someone else's help of course.
Apparently Dan liked my bigcubes comp idea...![]()
Uhh no. The idea of a bigcubes only comp has been thrown around for months and months. Dan just finally stopped being lazy and organized it.
You guys don't get the point of this do you? The point is that 3x3 sucks and it brings in all the noobs. All the good cubers want the chance to have a competition without the annoyance of all the idiots, and to have a jolly good time while they're at it. Also, jcuber, I can assure you this idea was not yours at all. I recall discussing such a possibility almost a year ago.
If I remember correctly, I thought of the idea (Unless it was before my time and I just thought of it on my own, which is possible. The new search function sucks.) and was shot down because of the "3x3 is what started this whole hobby" idea.
I'm glad that I can finally participate in megaminx. Why have there been so few competitions with megaminx as an event?
EDIT: Any thought to the other part of my original post? (another comp like this perhaps in the fall or something) Is this just a one-time deal? If so, I may consider organizing something like this...with someone else's help of course.
I have to be honest here:
No you won't. You're not qualified to host a Rubik's Cube competition. And I'm not doing all the work.
If you've only competed twice, and didn't contribute to those two competitions, you are in no position to organize a competition.
Very good question! And the answer (to everyone, not just to you) is simply volunteer to help the organizer of another competition you attend. Offer to help early, weeks before the competition starts, so the organizer will know you're available. The organizer will likely use you in small ways first, and increase your responsibilities as you demonstrate your usefulness by quietly and competently executing those you've been given. This is how everyone should get started.I didn't mean you Bob, I meant anyone willing to help. How would one go about helping out with the organization of other competitions?
I searched but nothing came up...
Could like 5 of you call me a moron please? It will make me feel better.
Perhaps take the sum of the ranks of cubes 4-7 for each person, and whoever has the lowest sum wins. (Just a suggestion)Out of curiosity, what's it gonna say on the WCA homepage and speedcubing.com about who "wins" Big Cubes Summer 2009?
Perhaps take the sum of the ranks of cubes 4-7 for each person, and whoever has the lowest sum wins. (Just a suggestion)Out of curiosity, what's it gonna say on the WCA homepage and speedcubing.com about who "wins" Big Cubes Summer 2009?
I think that's a very reasonable way of doing it. It seems we either have to pick one event or put a sum.
Or we could just announce that Dan Cohen won Big Cubes Summer 2009, because that's going to happen no matter what.
Perhaps take the sum of the ranks of cubes 4-7 for each person, and whoever has the lowest sum wins. (Just a suggestion)Out of curiosity, what's it gonna say on the WCA homepage and speedcubing.com about who "wins" Big Cubes Summer 2009?
I think that's a very reasonable way of doing it. It seems we either have to pick one event or put a sum.
Or we could just announce that Dan Cohen won Big Cubes Summer 2009, because that's going to happen no matter what.
Not to be the gloomy gus, but do we have a contingency plan for bad weather?
@ Ethan - haha, hey if that's the way we're counting results I don't think I will mind in the least ;-)