Upcoming 3x3s

Waste of money lol. I'm never getting this. GAN does this every time, and really, it's annoying me. Who is gonna pay extra just to get a pink cube?! 😂 😭 💀🥀
it’s essentially an investment
it’s limited edition, so it won’t be on sale forever. When it does become discontinued, the value might go up (since it’s limited edition, so only a handful are available to the public). When the value goes up, you can then sell it, and get some good money to buy other cubes that you want. It’s like investing into an expensive Rolex.
 
it’s essentially an investment
it’s limited edition, so it won’t be on sale forever. When it does become discontinued, the value might go up (since it’s limited edition, so only a handful are available to the public). When the value goes up, you can then sell it, and get some good money to buy other cubes that you want. It’s like investing into an expensive Rolex.
Thank you. This has changed my opinion to some degree, but it's still not for me. :)
 
I might get this cube just to see if it's worth it, because tbh I don't think it will be anything special for performance, just the latter of what you said.

Edit: Not the first time moretry's shoved too many magnets into one cube lol
I can't wait to read your findings. To me, the extra core magnets, like 20 on top of 8, are more important to make the turning less bumpy when those magnets pass each other. Remember that magnet attraction or repulsion forces are not linear, unlike springs, but exponential, and the effect is more pronounced for very high TPS and solve times measured in seconds (for Yiheng! and probably not much at all for me). In other words, for the same amount of core attraction, smaller/weaker but more number of magnets along the path or trajectory can make fast spins smoother, and hence more controllable. It's analogous to driving very fast past a few speed bumps versus a larger number of smaller ones over the same distance.

Now, the number 20 has always intrigued me. Was that number of magnets chosen due to manufacturing difficulty? It seems to me 32 is the right number. You see, 8 magnets, with one in each octant of the sphere surrounding the centre, is evenly distributed. Add more magnets evenly around those 8, and it seems 32 would be right. They will be tiny magnets.

It will be very interesting to see what Moretry can deliver. Manufacturing quality, precision or tolerances will be important with such high numbers and tiny parts to yield the desired effect. I think we should be grateful to Moretry for pushing the envelope, and I wish them more success.👍🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
 
Last edited:
I can't wait to read your findings. To me, the extra core magnets, like 20 on top of 8, are more important to make the turning less bumpy when those magnets pass each other. Remember that magnet attraction or repulsion forces are not linear, but exponential, and the effect is more pronounced for very high TPS and solve times measured in seconds (for Yiheng! and probably not much at all for me). In other words, for the same amount of core attraction, smaller/weaker but more number of magnets along the path or trajectory can make fast spins smoother, and hence more controllable. It's analogous to driving very fast past a few speed bumps versus a larger number of smaller ones over the same distance.

Now, the number 20 has always intrigued me. Was that number of magnets chosen due to manufacturing difficulty? It seems to me 32 is the right number. You see, 8 magnets, with one in each octant of the sphere surrounding the centre, is evenly distributed. Add more magnets evenly around those 8, and it seems 32 would be right. They will be tiny magnets.

It will be very interesting to see what Moretry can deliver. Manufacturing quality, precision or tolerances will be important with such high numbers and tiny parts to yield the desired effect. I think we should be grateful to Moretry for pushing the envelope, and I wish them more success.👍🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
wow, I didn’t know you had that much knowledge on cube design lol
it’s very intriguing!
 
I can't wait to read your findings. To me, the extra core magnets, like 20 on top of 8, are more important to make the turning less bumpy when those magnets pass each other. Remember that magnet attraction or repulsion forces are not linear, unlike springs, but exponential, and the effect is more pronounced for very high TPS and solve times measured in seconds (for Yiheng! and probably not much at all for me). In other words, for the same amount of core attraction, smaller/weaker but more number of magnets along the path or trajectory can make fast spins smoother, and hence more controllable. It's analogous to driving very fast past a few speed bumps versus a larger number of smaller ones over the same distance.

Now, the number 20 has always intrigued me. Was that number of magnets chosen due to manufacturing difficulty? It seems to me 32 is the right number. You see, 8 magnets, with one in each octant of the sphere surrounding the centre, is evenly distributed. Add more magnets evenly around those 8, and it seems 32 would be right. They will be tiny magnets.

It will be very interesting to see what Moretry can deliver. Manufacturing quality, precision or tolerances will be important with such high numbers and tiny parts to yield the desired effect. I think we should be grateful to Moretry for pushing the envelope, and I wish them more success.👍🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Surely the reason for a 20 magnet ball core is simply that there are 12 edges and 8 corners and each get a foot magnet which attracts to another magnet in the core?
 
So GAN isn't the only one doing year of the horse cubes
SAOcube is larping as Moretry at this point they just released some more Tianma mods
 
So GAN isn't the only one doing year of the horse cubes
SAOcube is larping as Moretry at this point they just released some more Tianma mods
Tianma means Sky Horse, so it's the most appropriate cube to have a year of the horse edition. I expect Moyu will have a lot of fun when the year of the dragon (Long) rolls around.
 
And after the Year of the Horse, it's the Year of the Goat. And, then the Tiger? or whatever. So, we will see some Gan cube named each year after each animal? 😉. And Moyu will release, after the 18th anniversary cubes, and the 19th anniversary Aolong and perhaps more later this year, also some 20th anniversary cubes next year, and then 21st anniversary ones the following year? These are so special unique once-in-a-lifetime occasions, you know?! 🤭
 
QiYi bubble cubes

bubble.webp
 
Yes, I love it, the Picube V100 Leap. I like smaller cubes. 54.5mm is optimal. This Picube Leap is nearly as pretty as my first love, the colourful Tornado V2, but noticeably lighter (65g) and smoother. It turns as well and feels as good as my second love, the Guhong Pro, but is better built and more stable. This Leap is the best light and small cube I have played with, also better than another favourite smaller cube, the Picube special edition WRM V9.

I'm happy because Gan started making 55mm cubes, as QiYi and Moyu (who made my previous favourite cubeon to 55.5mm size. Dayan still make 54mm and 55mm cubes, but it would be even better if Dayan can upgrade its Guhong cubes and release higher quality or higher end versions.
 
Last edited:
The special Southern Cross edition V100 here, unboxed by Feliks.


Green internals! I'm glad it's a different green, duller and darker, than the green colour of the pieces. I hope Gan learned the lesson and will avoid using the same colour as the pieces, esp if it's a bright one, for internals

70724.webp



70725.webp
 
Back
Top