[WR] Teodor Zajder 2.76 3x3 Single

Just think, if Max Park, Xuanyi Geng, Tymon Kolisinski, or Yiheng Wang got that scramble, it would be even faster.
I doubt any of them would have found the same solution Teodor did. In Dylan Miller’s breakdown of the solve, he goes over several excellent alternative paths that he and other top cubers might have chosen, none of which lead to an LL as easy as the one Teodor got. Maybe those cubers could turn faster than Teodor, but unless they found a sub-40 move solution that allowed them to sustain 14+ TPS, I don’t think they would have been faster.

There’s no question that those cubers are world-class, and in many cases more accomplished, but Teodor is not far behind. He has already been pacing ahead of Tymon at times and even winning competitions against him. He also has plenty of room to improve as he gets older. What really stands out here is that Teodor spotted a very clever solution that, in hindsight, looks simple, but was far from obvious at the time. On top of that, he executed it extremely well despite difficult finger tricks and awkward transitions, as Dylan highlighted in his video.

So no, I don’t think they necessarily would have found something better on this scramble. And even if only one top cuber received a scramble like this, that is part of speedcubing. A lucky scramble is still valid. If you recognise the opportunity and execute under pressure, you deserve the record. Other top cubers will get their chances too, whether the scramble is as favourable or not. At that point, it always comes down to execution under pressure, and that is never guaranteed.
 
Last edited:
If you want to make the argument that 3x3 WR single should not be something that's given attention or tracked then make that go ahead and make that argument. I'd support it.
But, trying to say that 'the luck based record doesn't hold merit and this is because the solver got "lucky" and that maybe if someone who was faster than this kid got it and was in the same group getting the same scramble that maybe perhaps they would have seen the same solution or a better solution and that under the pressure to perform well performed well and performed better maybe then this kid wouldn't have the world record and that someone more deserving would have gotten lucky in this luck based record' is, frankly, a ridiculously point to make and not one that you are coming across as well argued with.

Personally, the thing I care about for assessing how good a cuber is is by tracking their moving average. I do not think that having the WR single is all too impressive. What I find more impressive is the solvers who have a sub-5 moving average. I do not find 2x2 single or 2x2 ao5 impressive. I find it more impressive that there are solvers that can maintain a sub-1.3 moving average. Getting lucky isn't a crime and we can still recognise the significance of a record while also not associating it with "being the best-of-the-best".
If you have propositions to amend the WCA regulation in such a way where a record like this could never be repeated, go ahead. But, where the WCA is, at this point in time, this record, by all means, is 100% valid.

While I think your entire argument is poorly made I'd like to point out that saying Xuanyi, Yiheng, and Max Park don't get lucky is so comically absurd this it makes me question if you even bring up your concerns in good faith.

yo, yo dudes...

all this back and forth drama ought to be y'all DM'ing each other

save the rest of us all this suffering through so much annoying tripe

plz and ty
 
1000005770.jpg

lowest polish aura:
 
Bro, there’s mustard too, so it might just be some weird condiment aisle. But I’d say that’s ai or photoshopped or something.
Prolly is cuz no shop will have a whole isle dedicated to mayo 😭
Is this ai I can’t tell

While I certainly can't entirely confirm as it isn't my image (source was from the STUCube video), I highly doubt this is AI, from the perfect text on the packaging, the fingers, the perfectness of Teodor (there wouldn't exactly be the largest library of Teodor images for the model to base it off) and also it seems like something he would do. Worlds 2025 flashbacks
 
While I certainly can't entirely confirm as it isn't my image (source was from the STUCube video), I highly doubt this is AI, from the perfect text on the packaging, the fingers, the perfectness of Teodor (there wouldn't exactly be the largest library of Teodor images for the model to base it off) and also it seems like something he would do. Worlds 2025 flashbacks
Oh, I didn’t know it was from the STUcube video, but since it’s from there and not some random social media post then I’ll agree with you.
 
While I certainly can't entirely confirm as it isn't my image (source was from the STUCube video), I highly doubt this is AI, from the perfect text on the packaging, the fingers, the perfectness of Teodor (there wouldn't exactly be the largest library of Teodor images for the model to base it off) and also it seems like something he would do. Worlds 2025 flashbacks
IMG_6881.jpeg


It’s probably AI cuz this is the closest bottle I could find (the details in the red circle are different)

IMG_6876.jpeg
 
hot take: it wasn’t actually that hard to find Teodor’s solution
ok now hear me out… the xxxcross was only 11 moves and the last pair barely moves until you insert the green-white edge… a sub-8 or maybe even sub-9 solver could find that solution with enough cube knowledge. I actually was doing the same solution as Teodor until the point where he inserts the last pair. Dilly Milly says not to follow what Teodor did on other solves, but I disagree. It’s not all that hard to inspect 11 moves. 11 moves is pretty much the average cross+1 solution.

TDLR: Teodor’s solution was actually the most obvious solution (imo)
 
View attachment 46728

It’s probably AI cuz this is the closest bottle I could find (the details in the red circle are different)

View attachment 46729
When I saw this argument I also looked up the mustard bottle lol. First I couldnt find one with the same shape red box in the top left so I thought it was AI until I found the same one after searching for Polish mustard. I thought that proved it wasn't AI because ChatGPT wouldn't use a picture of Polish mustard but then I found the same mustard bottle in non-Polish shops(and turns out the original picture was from a UK shop even though I searched for Polish). Then I looked at the rest of the bottle and I did notice that the design at the bottom(same part you circled) didn't match. It was blurry though and it's hard to tell if the design is actually different, so I'm not 100% sure it's proof of AI. Also if the design is different it could just be the Polish design which would probably mean it isnt AI.

I just wrote an essay about a bottle of mustard what am I actually doing with my life
 
Back
Top