ruffleduck
Veteran
(Soon-to-be) math major here. The stuff is fascinatin. Green's theorem is what first really cemented my love for math, it is so brilliant
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
what's so good about it? it's just a specific case of generalized Stokes' theorem which doesn't make assumptions about working in R^2 or R^3(Soon-to-be) math major here. The stuff is fascinatin. Green's theorem is what first really cemented my love for math, it is so brilliant
it's a constant cycle of learning what you learned is just a special case of something more general!I feel like most of us cubers like math a lot.
I'm also homeschooled, and I also am excelled in math.same for me you could say "I'm at the top of my class"
I like math a lot.Do you like math?
Do you have a major in math?
I’m famous! We had a discussion about this on my profile a little bit and I said the following over there: I think loads of cubers are maths nerds, not because cubing needs maths, but because people who aren’t good at maths are more likely to be intimidated by a cube and think it needs maths, so they’re less likely to learn it.I like maths, but am ashamed to say I do not have a major. Also @Isabellikesmaths
my brother uses RI wish I did more math (such as calculus) in undergrad. I've taken Statistics, Biostatistics, and Physics (I know that's not pure mathematics, but as a science it involves plenty of math). Through Biostatistics I also got a very good introduction to R. I've taken several GIS (Geographic Information Systems) courses and work as a GIS technician. This greatly involves understanding the attributes associated with spatial data, recognizing outliers, and finding the most effective data and algorithms/tools to answer questions of spatial analysis (e.g., What percent of this local park is x soil type?, What areas of a city are readily accessible to fire services?, How are socioeconomic demographics reflective of home size?, etc.). My final project last semester was mapping out land use change throughout Chechnya (a republic in Russia) following the Second Chechen War between 1999-2009. This allowed us to both visualize and calculate that Chechnya was subject to significantly more land use change in comparison to any other republic of the North Caucasus, and we could even visualize exact areas where particular war events (e.g., bombings) occurred.
I've done Chemistry and plenty of Biology too, which both involve math for experimental design and result interpretation. One needs to estimate cell concentrations, temperatures, understand results from spectrophotometry, determine statistical significance of results (e.g., p<0.5), and the list can go on and on. In biology, I feel like contextualizing numbers and recognizing trends is extremely important. Quantitative analysis is integral for communicating and presenting results, but qualitative analysis and the ability to recognize notable trends (even if they aren't statistically significant) is equally important.
There is less math on the anthropology side of things for me, but still some depending on the subdiscipline. In biological anthropology, we have both metric analysis and visual scoring systems for estimating aspects of a biological profile including age at death and estimated biological sex (different than gender identity). These fall into ranges, but as every individual is extraordinarily different given so many variables, not everyone perfectly falls into finite categories. My focus is the more molecular side of things though, so I focus heavily on genetics and microbiology in relation to human evolution and environmental interactions.
Not really a rhyme, but it's still funny.Math is .... uhhhh (help i cant think of a word that means something bad that rhymes with math)
Ohw **** i dont want more of that :cNot really a rhyme, but it's still funny.
Mental
Abuse
To
Humans
I like mathematics
That's more of a physics question, where the answer is… you guessed it, it depends!For all of the math nerds, in temperature measurement is their a negative and a positive 0, or is 0 just 1 number. (Excluding kelvins of course.)
Where's the "all of the above" option?
I hate it, but I also love it, but I'm terrible at it, but I majored in it, but…
That's more of a physics question, where the answer is… you guessed it, it depends!
For everyday temperature measurements (in Celsius, or if you live on the wrong side of the planet, in Fahrenheit), +0 and −0 are one and the same.
But, at least for Celsius users, there is a significant practical difference between a temperature denoted as "+0 °C" versus a temperature denoted as "−0 °C", which is that the former actually means a temperature slightly above 0 and the latter slightly below. This matters because water is a liquid in the former case, and a solid in the latter case. As it turns out, our planet is filled with water, and knowing whether this substance is solid or liquid is often important.
There's another sense of negative temperature which I unfortunately don't understand well enough to explain, but you can read about it on Wikipedia or something.