Reduced CFCE/Platform

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 27249
  • Start date Start date
Yes

But

They’re still way worse
Cross+ F2L +:
Platform Standard or
B (block 1x1x3)
L (Line)
CFBL.

Advanced Platform
BTC (block 1x1x3 + Two Corners) or CMLL + 1 Edge or AB (Advanced Block)
ELL
It's version Advanced of CFCE
CFC+1E or CFABE

PLS or BLS (Last Slot F2L + block 1x1x3)

BTCLS (Last Slot F2L + block 1x1x3 + Two Corners) or ABLS (Last Slot F2L +Advanced Block)

Ok I understand for you It's worse.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It’s interesting, I do have a question, when it’s optimized and everything, how many algs would it take to do last layer? (Not to memo but to execute on a given solve)Ik it’s probably somewhere in the earlier posts, but I read through them and don’t know what any of the abbreviations mean, sorry for my ignorance lol 😂
 
It’s interesting, I do have a question, when it’s optimized and everything, how many algs would it take to do last layer? (Not to memo but to execute on a given solve)Ik it’s probably somewhere in the earlier posts, but I read through them and don’t know what any of the abbreviations mean, sorry for my ignorance lol 😂
I dont Know.
For CFBL or Platform Standard I use for step One 25 Algs to solve 50 cases and for step Two I use 71 Algs to solve 71 cases.
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    41.5 KB · Views: 1
I dont Know.
For CFBL or Platform Standard I use for step One 25 Algs to solve 50 cases and for step Two I use 71 Algs to solve 71 cases.
78 is the algs for full OLL and PLL, and OLL and PLL is many times more efficient and faster than this method. I honestly don’t see the point of it. Is there any advantages to this method? It seems like there aren’t any.
 
78 is the algs for full OLL and PLL, and OLL and PLL is many times more efficient and faster than this method. I honestly don’t see the point of it. Is there any advantages to this method? It seems like there aren’t any.
Ok
 
CFCE>>>>CFOP
CFCE have 67 algs.
CFOP>>>>CFBL
CFOP have 78 algs.
CFBL is only a different variant.
CFBL have 96 algs.
My best ao12 with CFBL
18.83 = 20.48, 20.13, 18.95, 19.06, (23.42), 20.41, 18.57, 15.63, 18.48, 18.31, 18.27, (15.47)
 
For ELL, that isn't possible.
It's impossible just because people don't do their best

Is it impossible to solve megaminx in -25 seconds?
Is it impossible to make a physical 4 dimensional 3x3?
The moment you think "time dilation is hard to learn" or "it's hard to transcend the multiverse and recognize ell from 2 sides" you just keep doing things like everyone else
 
Do you have all the algs made? Cause it would be fun to find ways to finger trick them and see if some cases are better for platform, and which are better for cfop. People do be hating but it seems like your having fun so!
This is an old guide i need to make a new one.
The guide doesn't reflect the reality of what I do.
Maybe it has some errors in this old guide. In step One I know 80 cases about and I use about 30 Algs.The Algs I use in the step Two are different to this old guide.
I have collaborators to make the new guide.
Yes for me is fun! 😁
 

Attachments

Last edited by a moderator:
Actually ELL recognition is possible from 2 sides.
Edit: even without transcending the multiverse
Look at a U Perm with the Bar up front.
By Looking at the U face and the F Face, you can't deduct if you have Ua, Ub or a Skip, you need to look at R or L.
Do a Z Perm.
Look at only F and R. Without looking at U, you you might know their Permutative state, but you can't know if those two Edges are Oriented or not. Finding that out would entail also looking at U.
 
Back
Top