Breaks

[krazedkat]

Taking a few days break is great for your hands but KILLER on your time... At least for me.... Look!:

Cross: 00:05.28
F2L: 00:25.89
LL: 00:19.02
Total: 50.19

Sad, Sad solve ... Any hints?

 

[Ethan Rosen]

do more solves

 

[byu]

Um... what was your current average before taking a break?

And yes, taking a break kills your times. If I take even a 12 hour break (sleep not included) from practicing BLD memo, I go from 35 seconds up to maybe a minute. I did that today, and now I'm practicing memo to get it back up to speed.

 

[Sa967St]

I don`t take breaks
The longest I`ve lasted without cubing is about 2 days, and that`s only because I was studying for exams.

 

[shicklegroober]

I can't take breaks either, even when I need to be studying for exams.. like now.. or doing annotated bibliographies for english class.. School is really affecting my cubing right now.

 

[IamWEB]

I can't take breaks either, even when I need to be studying for exams.. like now.. or doing annotated bibliographies for english class.. School is really affecting my cubing right now.

Be careful, turn that statement around.

Cubing is really affecting your school right now.

 

[krazedkat]

I used to get sub-20!

 

[Lord Voldemort]

Really?
A 30 Second drop in a few days sounds unreasonable...
I've never gone more than like, 5 hours without solving a cube... (besides sleep)

 

[KubeKid73]

I don't constantly cube. I actually don't cube that often. And my times stay the same. Anywhere from 45-1:00.

 

[Kian]

I used to get sub-20!

i'm calling bs. just like your old post about your secret unexplainable 2x2 method.

 

[Gparker]

am i the only one who does this? i solve the cube once atleast every 5 hours including sleep, see what i do is memorize a cube and use something like old pochmann to solve it in my sleep

 

[krazedkat]

I used to get sub-20!

i'm calling bs. just like your old post about your secret unexplainable 2x2 method.

Man, you suck at grammar. You should've said "I'm calling BS! Just like your old post about your secret unexplainable 2x2x2 method!" The sad thing is that you're still BSing me about that. First: The 2x2x2 has what? 8 cubies? THAT'S ALL? Second: Who cares?

 

[MistArts]

I used to get sub-20!

i'm calling bs. just like your old post about your secret unexplainable 2x2 method.

Man, you suck at grammar. You should've said "I'm calling BS! Just like your old post about your secret unexplainable 2x2x2 method!" The sad thing is that you're still BSing me about that. First: The 2x2x2 has what? 8 cubies? THAT'S ALL? Second: Who cares?

You failed to explain how to solve a puzzle with eight cubies.

 

[krazedkat]

I used to get sub-20!

i'm calling bs. just like your old post about your secret unexplainable 2x2 method.

Man, you suck at grammar. You should've said "I'm calling BS! Just like your old post about your secret unexplainable 2x2x2 method!" The sad thing is that you're still BSing me about that. First: The 2x2x2 has what? 8 cubies? THAT'S ALL? Second: Who cares?

You failed to explain how to solve a puzzle with eight cubies.

How did I fail? I never even tried!

 

[not_kevin]

I used to get sub-20!

i'm calling bs. just like your old post about your secret unexplainable 2x2 method.

Man, you suck at grammar. You should've said "I'm calling BS! Just like your old post about your secret unexplainable 2x2x2 method!" The sad thing is that you're still BSing me about that. First: The 2x2x2 has what? 8 cubies? THAT'S ALL? Second: Who cares?

You failed to explain how to solve a puzzle with eight cubies.

How did I fail? I never even tried!

That shows moar fail from you. You named a mysterious method that was 1-look, said you could get a 3s average, then said you couldn't explain the method and that it was impossible for you to load a video of your method. Then you edited your time to 5s, and still failed to elaborate on your method. Personally, if you can't explain a method, it's because you don't have one to explain.

 

[krazedkat]

I used to get sub-20!

i'm calling bs. just like your old post about your secret unexplainable 2x2 method.

Man, you suck at grammar. You should've said "I'm calling BS! Just like your old post about your secret unexplainable 2x2x2 method!" The sad thing is that you're still BSing me about that. First: The 2x2x2 has what? 8 cubies? THAT'S ALL? Second: Who cares?

You failed to explain how to solve a puzzle with eight cubies.

How did I fail? I never even tried!

That shows moar fail from you. You named a mysterious method that was 1-look, said you could get a 3s average, then said you couldn't explain the method and that it was impossible for you to load a video of your method. Then you edited your time to 5s, and still failed to elaborate on your method. Personally, if you can't explain a method, it's because you don't have one to explain.

Yes, because MOAR is certainly a word...

 

[not_kevin]

I used to get sub-20!

i'm calling bs. just like your old post about your secret unexplainable 2x2 method.

Man, you suck at grammar. You should've said "I'm calling BS! Just like your old post about your secret unexplainable 2x2x2 method!" The sad thing is that you're still BSing me about that. First: The 2x2x2 has what? 8 cubies? THAT'S ALL? Second: Who cares?

You failed to explain how to solve a puzzle with eight cubies.

How did I fail? I never even tried!

That shows moar fail from you. You named a mysterious method that was 1-look, said you could get a 3s average, then said you couldn't explain the method and that it was impossible for you to load a video of your method. Then you edited your time to 5s, and still failed to elaborate on your method. Personally, if you can't explain a method, it's because you don't have one to explain.

Yes, because MOAR is certainly a word...

Yes, it actually is. http://lmgtfy.com/?q=moar
See how Google doesn't pwn you by saying it's spelled wrong? And also see how there are actually over 9,000 different results (heck, there are more than 9000^2)? And see how you don't know memes?

 

[James Kobel]

I used to get sub-20!

i'm calling bs. just like your old post about your secret unexplainable 2x2 method.

Man, you suck at grammar. You should've said "I'm calling BS! Just like your old post about your secret unexplainable 2x2x2 method!" The sad thing is that you're still BSing me about that. First: The 2x2x2 has what? 8 cubies? THAT'S ALL? Second: Who cares?

You failed to explain how to solve a puzzle with eight cubies.

How did I fail? I never even tried!

That shows moar fail from you. You named a mysterious method that was 1-look, said you could get a 3s average, then said you couldn't explain the method and that it was impossible for you to load a video of your method. Then you edited your time to 5s, and still failed to elaborate on your method. Personally, if you can't explain a method, it's because you don't have one to explain.

Yes, because MOAR is certainly a word...

When he said you fail he meant that you failed to explain, not that it was a bad explanation obviously because you conveniently didn't explain anything. There is absolutely no reason to believe you about 2x2 or 3x3 or anything for that matter. I don't trust you either. You are obviously lying. There is evidence all over of you not telling the truth. If you can't find it, you fail. If your camera is fixed now make a video to prove yourself. Unless of course, your camera was stolen :rolleyes: But it most likely "isn't" fixed.

 

[krazedkat]

A) Stop fretting on the past
B) I don't lie
C) I don't care if you believe me. You're probably just some 46 year old living in your uncles basement.
D) This topic is about 3x3x3 NOT 2x2x2.
E) You all suck
F) Look on the other forums I'm signed up for! I'm one of the most helpful people out there!

 

[bundat]

I used to get sub-20!

i'm calling bs. just like your old post about your secret unexplainable 2x2 method.

Man, you suck at grammar. You should've said "I'm calling BS! Just like your old post about your secret unexplainable 2x2x2 method!" The sad thing is that you're still BSing me about that. First: The 2x2x2 has what? 8 cubies? THAT'S ALL? Second: Who cares?

Why would you comment about grammar on what was obviously a casual post? And you didn't change anything, only capitalization. Not using capitalization on a casual post is "sucking at grammar"?

And quite frankly, you don't have the right to correct him, because you suck at grammar yourself!

"Just like your old post about your secret unexplainable 2x2x2 method!" is NOT a sentence. You were supposedly correcting his grammar, and yet you left it just the same. So don't blame me if I quote you to yourself, "Man, you suck at grammar."

"Yes, because MOAR is certainly a word... " is also not a proper sentence.
If you want to pick at grammar, you should first take a look at your own posts.

C) I don't care if you believe me. You're probably just some 46 year old living in your uncles basement.

I don't even want to point out what the error is here. I was under the impression that they teach this in grade school.

Instead of bringing up valid points, you just grasp at straws by correcting grammatical errors, such as lack of capitalization (on casual posts, mind you) and incorrect spelling (such as "moar", which is obviously internet slang), and yet you still fail at it. How sad, you should just stop trying.