Is full oll worth learning?

[Abucuberksa]

I am learning full pll and thought is full oll is worth even learning because my I can complete oll in 2 sec... pls help

 

[Timona]

Yes. You can always solve any OLL with 2 algs, but it's even better if you can solve it in one.

 

[IsThatA4x4]

I am learning full pll and thought is full oll is worth even learning because my I can complete oll in 2 sec... pls help

It is worth it. There are many reasons:
- Often doing 2 look leads to a regrip and pause in between algs, often also an extra AUF, wasting time
- Obviously just doing 1 alg is faster, and will have better fingertricks. For example, with 2 look you will do a 6 mover followed by, on average, a 9 mover, with an AUF in between = 16 moves
With full OLL, you average about 10-11 moves
- At a more advanced level, it is much much easier to do things like OLLCP, CP prediction, and diag PLL avoidance if you know full OLL

- Actually learning it is not as hard as it seems! Most of the algs are just combinations of common triggers or modified common triggers, and the algs are short.
For example:
r' U2 R U R' U r = Fat antibacksune
r U2 R' U' R U' r' = Fat antisune
r U R' U R U2 r' = Fat sune
l' U' L U' L' U2 l = Fat lefty sune
r' R2 U R' U R U2 R' U M' = M (sune) U M'
M' R' U' R U' R' U2 R U' M
= M' (backsune) U' M
F R' F' R2 r' U R U' R' U' M'
= (Hedgeslammer) M (inverse sexy) U' M'
r' R U R U R' U' M' R' F R F' =
M U (sexy) M' (sledge)
r' R U R U R' U' M2 U R U' r'
= M U (sexy) M2 (fat inverse sexy)
S R U R' U' R' F R f' = S (sexy) (fat sledge)
R U R' U' R' F R F' = (sexy) (sledge)
...
And so on, you get the point, a huge portion of the algs are like this.

 

[abunickabhi]

I am learning full pll and thought is full oll is worth even learning because my I can complete oll in 2 sec... pls help

Full OLL is worth it. It makes your solve more efficient and reduces one look.

 

[Abucuberksa]

Thanks

It is worth it. There are many reasons:
- Often doing 2 look leads to a regrip and pause in between algs, often also an extra AUF, wasting time
- Obviously just doing 1 alg is faster, and will have better fingertricks. For example, with 2 look you will do a 6 mover followed by, on average, a 9 mover, with an AUF in between = 16 moves
With full OLL, you average about 10-11 moves
- At a more advanced level, it is much much easier to do things like OLLCP, CP prediction, and diag PLL avoidance if you know full OLL

- Actually learning it is not as hard as it seems! Most of the algs are just combinations of common triggers or modified common triggers, and the algs are short.
For example:
r' U2 R U R' U r = Fat antibacksune
r U2 R' U' R U' r' = Fat antisune
r U R' U R U2 r' = Fat sune
l' U' L U' L' U2 l = Fat lefty sune
r' R2 U R' U R U2 R' U M' = M (sune) U M'
M' R' U' R U' R' U2 R U' M
= M' (backsune) U' M
F R' F' R2 r' U R U' R' U' M'
= (Hedgeslammer) M (inverse sexy) U' M'
r' R U R U R' U' M' R' F R F' =
M U (sexy) M' (sledge)
r' R U R U R' U' M2 U R U' r'
= M U (sexy) M2 (fat inverse sexy)
S R U R' U' R' F R f' = S (sexy) (fat sledge)
R U R' U' R' F R F' = (sexy) (sledge)
...
And so on, you get the point, a huge portion of the algs are like this.

How much time did you exactly put into writing this biography, but thanks I will try to learn full oll.

Full OLL is worth it. It makes your solve more efficient and reduces one look.

OK will learn

Yes. You can always solve any OLL with 2 algs, but it's even better if you can solve it in one.

OK thanks for the advice

 

[NigelTheCuber]

yep, full oll is worth learning, it is much less than 57 algs when you think about it because some cases are similar to each other.