[Member Intro] ZZ user (haha noob)

[tripat]

Hey! I recently switched to ZZ from CFOP, and that's basically the only note-worthy thing I've done in cubing (and in life sob) other than maybe starting to learn CLL for 2x2, or getting a sub-50 4x4 single quite a few weeks ago. After a few weeks of ZZ, I'm almost as fast with it as I am with CFOP (mid to high 12s with both), and right now my aim is to be sub-10 with ZZ, and sub 3ish with CLL on 2x2. I've been using the forum for quite a while for just viewing threads, but never registered for some reason (tho I think this a start, maybe?). Hoping to talk to a lot of people here and promote ZZ endlessly!

 

[DiamondGolem12]

Welcome! I use cfop and I'm thinking of switching to ZZ

 

[the dnf master]

Welcome! I also use CFOP and will probably will never switch to ZZ, so I invite you to convince me to switch.

 

[ruffleduck]

I'm glad you're on the forums finally!

 

[tripat]

Welcome! I use cfop and I'm thinking of switching to ZZ

pro

Welcome! I also use CFOP and will probably will never switch to ZZ, so I invite you to convince me to switch.

i'll try :sweatsprofusely:

I'm glad you're on the forums finally!

yo me too!

 

[LBr]

Hey! I recently switched to ZZ from CFOP, and that's basically the only note-worthy thing I've done in cubing (and in life sob) other than maybe starting to learn CLL for 2x2, or getting a sub-50 4x4 single quite a few weeks ago. After a few weeks of ZZ, I'm almost as fast with it as I am with CFOP (mid to high 12s with both), and right now my aim is to be sub-10 with ZZ, and sub 3ish with CLL on 2x2. I've been using the forum for quite a while for just viewing threads, but never registered for some reason (tho I think this a start, maybe?). Hoping to talk to a lot of people here and promote ZZ endlessly!

lol I will never switch to ZZ.

With 2x2 I use cll and sub 4 is easy. However it will be a challenge to get sub 3 with it. If you want to be sub 3 I would probably learn EG-1

 

[ruffleduck]

lol I will never switch to ZZ.

With 2x2 I use cll and sub 4 is easy. However it will be a challenge to get sub 3 with it. If you want to be sub 3 I would probably learn EG-1

I have a sub 2.9 ao100 with only CLL, and Ram Thakkar globally averaged low 2 with only CLL before learning EG-1 iirc. Not the hard to be sub 3 with only CLL if you efficiently build your layer and recognize/predict CLL case well.

 

[LBr]

I have a sub 2.9 ao100 with only CLL, and Ram Thakkar globally averaged low 2 with only CLL before learning EG-1 iirc. Not the hard to be sub 3 with only CLL if you efficiently build your layer and recognize/predict CLL case well.

that. guy. turn. fast. just. look. at. his. plls

 

[DuckubingCuber347]

lol I will never switch to ZZ.

You're as anti-ZZ as Jay used to be @LBr

 

[Swagrid]

Tripat finally on forums pogu

 

[BenChristman1]

Welcome! I don't use ZZ for 2-handed solving, but I did recently switch to using it for OH. It is a really fun method, and it also teaches EO, which is a great thing to learn, even if you don't use ZZ!

 

[Deleted member 36445]

i liek z

 

[Waffles]

ayyy, more ZZ user. Tbh I don’t actually use ZZ as my main method, but I use it for OH. Two handed I can get maybe 25 seconds.

Getting sub-3 with CLL will be hard, possible but hard. Personally I average about 4 with CLL and I know like every EG-1 case except for 2-3 U cases. When using a mix I generally average about 3.5 seconds. If you do want to be fast with CLL, one-looking is actually a must-do.

4x4 is enjoyable! Because it takes like a minute to solve at this point (once I get some bigger cubes I might change my opinion though.) and I’d like to sa-

 

[CodingCuber]

Welcome!

 

[tripat]

lol I will never switch to ZZ.

With 2x2 I use cll and sub 4 is easy. However it will be a challenge to get sub 3 with it. If you want to be sub 3 I would probably learn EG-1

why so jayden bro

Tripat finally on forums pogu

pogu

Welcome! I don't use ZZ for 2-handed solving, but I did recently switch to using it for OH. It is a really fun method, and it also teaches EO, which is a great thing to learn, even if you don't use ZZ!

thanks! and yeah, zz is really good for OH. do you use eoline or eocross for OH?

i liek z

zed is incredible

ayyy, more ZZ user. Tbh I don’t actually use ZZ as my main method, but I use it for OH. Two handed I can get maybe 25 seconds.

Getting sub-3 with CLL will be hard, possible but hard. Personally I average about 4 with CLL and I know like every EG-1 case except for 2-3 U cases. When using a mix I generally average about 3.5 seconds. If you do want to be fast with CLL, one-looking is actually a must-do.

4x4 is enjoyable! Because it takes like a minute to solve at this point (once I get some bigger cubes I might change my opinion though.) and I’d like to sa-

yeah im planning to work on my cll recognition really soon, because i just learnt sune and anti-sune and my recognition is just too bad. so yeah, expect at least sub 4 coming with better recog and eventually one looking. and 4x4 at this point is just annoying but fun for me too, because i average a little over a minute on it (still not sub minute lol)

Welcome!

thanks!

 

[BenChristman1]

thanks! and yeah, zz is really good for OH. do you use eoline or eocross for OH?

Like I said, I just switched very recently, so I haven’t had much time to choose yet. I’ve been experimenting with both, though, and I think that I’m leaning towards EO line. I’ve also heard that EO line is better for OH, but EO cross is better for 2-handed, so hopefully I’m doing the right thing.

Also, just so you know for the future, you can reply to multiple posts in just one post by pressing “Reply” on multiple posts.

 

[abunickabhi]

ZZ is a cool method.

Welcome. I hope you find enough new ZZ resources on this forum.

 

[LBr]

You're as anti-ZZ as Jay used to be @LBr

i don't really hate zz (But i don't like it), but i like to make fun of it

 

[ruffleduck]

i don't really hate zz (But i do)

 

[Sub1Hour]

Welcome to the forums, I use ZZ for OH (sometimes)