2.64 Single (Jackmennie_23 on IG)

[alexiscubing]

yellow preserve the free pair

solution that we both had
yellow bottom blue front
U' R
L U' L'
U L' U' L
U R U' R' U R U' R'
U' R' U' R

first try without seeing the scramble beforehand 5.14
after that 2.62 it is very easy the only thing people might not see is the cross that preserves the pair

 

[brododragon]

So no one has any actual proof that it was generated by csTimer?

 

[alexiscubing]

i think he does, i will check later

 

[u Cube]

"The recon is on his story, but both of us think that it is that stupid that it shouldn't count as his PB or UWR (of course no video evidence so it wouldn't have been uwr anyway). "
doesn't need to be recorded to be uwr. Also this will be a recurring problem, anybody not world class who gets a sub 3 (maybe even sub-3.5) will have people who doubt them. A thread similar to this was made about Sameer Aggarwal. But anybody who is sub-10 could probably get a sub-3 with the right scramble, just a matter of how long it takes to get one.

 

[fun at the joy]

The solution is very straightforward

This post doesn't make sense at all.
This makes it even more suspicious if he doesn't count it as a legit solve.

"This is the scramble to my UWR (w)ich I'm not counting" - Just think about that sentence for a bit and notice how extremely stupid this is.

Maybe I would've believed him (haven't looked at the scramble yet) but this post just ****s me up and has destroyed all the hope.

 

[ProStar]

This post doesn't make sense at all.
This makes it even more suspicious if he doesn't count it as a legit solve.

"This is the scramble to my UWR (w)ich I'm not counting" - Just think about that sentence for a bit and notice how extremely stupid this is.

Maybe I would've believed him (haven't looked at the scramble yet) but this post just ****s me up and has destroyed all the hope.

I agree, It's like @Shaun Mack said: Not counting a WB is a fancy way of saying it was faked (paraphrased)

 

[Username: Username:]

What cross did he go for?

I can't find any good solutions to it.

I (think) it's the blue cross.

I got 2 free F2L pairs and the other two was easy, OLL is Sune, PLL is the Gd Perm?! how many Gd Perms do I get? lol

edit : I didn't see other people posting the solution when I posted this.

 

[ProStar]

What cross did he go for?

I can't find any good solutions to it.

1 Move yellow cross, 2 moves if you want to preserve a free pair

 

[Ayce]

The scramble might have been one of those 3x3 subsets which give you obvious x-cross(es) I would think it isn't legit, no video and breakdown is suspicious. CFOP solves have triple the move count.

 

[brododragon]

I agree, It's like @Shaun Mack said: Not counting a WB is a fancy way of saying it was faked (paraphrased)

Yeah. It seems like he just wants all the attention without people actually caring to debunk it because it's not the WB.

 

[ProStar]

The scramble might have been one of those 3x3 subsets which give you obvious x-cross(es) I would think it isn't legit, no video and breakdown is suspicious. CFOP solves have triple the move count.

To be fair, lucky solves will obviously have way lower movecount than normal. Yusheng's solve was 27 moves

 

[brododragon]

To be fair, lucky solves will obviously have way lower movecount than normal. Yusheng's solve was 27 moves

Yusheng's solve was one in literal millions.

 

[ProStar]

Yusheng's solve was one in literal millions.

That doesn't change anything, it's possible for a scramble that easy to come up

 

[Username: Username:]

To be fair, lucky solves will obviously have way lower movecount than normal. Yusheng's solve was 27 moves

Why didn't Yusheng get a sub 3 or a low 2? I (think) the amount of luckiness in Yusheng's scramble was the same as this scramble.

 

[WoowyBaby]

To be fair, lucky solves will obviously have way lower movecount than normal. Yusheng's solve was 27 moves

The difference between 27 and 21 is not small. I would say it's equivalent to 40 moves versus 52 moves or something like that.

And also, this solve was literally just 3 free pairs and a skip so I can basically be certain it's set up.

Something like 2x2x3 -> Multislot -> ZBLL, or just something with uniqueness that shows it's not a 'perfect solve' that would never show up just due to its simplicity (and having 3 free pairs lol).

 

[brododragon]

Also, beside the math, there's some other shady things about this solve.
1. He said he did it with a Yuxin Timer, but retried without it.
2. Dead Giveaway: He doesn't want to count it as a WB or PB.

 

[alexiscubing]

I think the main reason h

solution that we both had
yellow bottom blue front
U' R
L U' L'
U L' U' L
U R U' R' U R U' R'
U' R' U' R

guys this is the recon
it is rly straightforward
preserve free pair and insert into back
free pair in front left
easy pair in front right
free pair back left LL skip no auf

Also, beside the math, there's some other shady things about this solve.
1. He said he did it with a Yuxin Timer, but retried without it.
2. Dead Giveaway: He doesn't want to count it as a WB or PB.

Im just saying if you got a 2 single on a scrmable like this would you say to everyone that you got WB and a 2 single? No, he wants to keep knowledge of it down and doesn't want hate from people saying you dont deserve it. that is why he isnt counting it as uwr

 

[brododragon]

Im just saying if you got a 2 single on a scrmable like this would you say to everyone that you got WB and a 2 single? No, he wants to keep knowledge of it down and doesn't want hate from people saying you dont deserve it. that is why he isnt counting it as uwr

So he’s passing up bring pretty famous because he doesn’t want people trying to disprove his totally legit solve with no evidence (not even a screenshot) and a bunch of other shady things? It’s not that we hate him, it's just like science; try to disprove something in every way possible.

 

[alexiscubing]

everyone hated on many solves, such as the andrew huang wr and the sameer agarwal wb

 

[brododragon]

everyone hated on many solves, such as the andrew huang wr and the sameer agarwal wb

But they're so many other things wrong with the solve besides the fact he's not counting it. 3 free pairs?? Preserved EO?