Yes, there's a lot of videos that fail to explain things properly. JPerm has many good videos, but I'm not a very big fan of his intuitive F2L tutorial. He goes through it way too quickly imo, especially for a beginner to follow.
@40yearstosolve, like someone here said earlier, it is very much worth it to start looking into F2L as soon as possible. For me, learning about intuitive F2L was the big aha-moment that got me properly interested in cubing. Until then I had been doing layer by layer, just like you are, and I had seen algorithm sheets for more advanced methods. Specifically a list that had something like 96 different algorithms for F2L. I felt I would never ever be able to learn something like that and hence thought I could never get fast. Then I watched one video on intuitive F2L, which showed that I don't need to know 96 or whatever cases, but only three. On top of that, I did not need to learn any algorithms to solve any of these three cases, they could all be solved intuitively. This was many years ago and I'm not 100% sure which video I watched, but I think it was this one:
Now when I watched it many years later, I see some things that I might have explained differently, but overall I think it is very good with slow and clear instructions. While I have developed quite a few tricks over the past couple of years to improve on F2L, they have all been developed from the basic principles taught in that video. Give it a shot and maybe it will also take your cubing to the next level.
And of course feel free to ask if the video leaves something unclear.
