pglewis
Veteran
Just did a random timed EO+CFOP solve with unlimited inspection for the heck of it, 30.77. That would be a decent cold-solve time for me with straight CFOP.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

4x4: I'll drop. I can't get to the hard cut. It is 2m or 3m.. I'm at ~5m. Really.. I need more practice. I can solve 4x4, and enjoy it... but no way I'm making up that much time.
Are you using straight reduction? Yau or Hoya?
Yau.
My times are coming down.. but not enough that I'm making that cut in a week. Keep in mind my 3x3 OH times.
I've or more work into 4x4 and you've put more into OH, but I run ~34 2H, one solve it of 5 sub-1:00 OH, and 1:45-1:50 on 4x4. You might not be as far off as you think.
Yau.
My times are coming down.. but not enough that I'm making that cut in a week. Keep in mind my 3x3 OH times.
Yeah, if you're anything like me even if I found a miracle to shave that much time quickly I wouldn't have the confidence under me for comp conditions. If ya only had a couple more weeks!
Also a Yau user here, some focused half-centers practice has got me peaking right around 2m for my better solves now. Six weeks 'til comp so should be fun to see if I can luck into snagging an official average with those same cuts.
Good luck next weekend!
With OH I also struggle with orientation after doing the cross because of all the z, x, and y rotations happening, but I am getting better and not wasting time with carrying on. The look ahead practice I've been putting in on 2H has also been paying off with OH.@JohnnyReggae yeah, I find the cross the most awkward part of the solve in OH too. I try to grab the cube in ways that can at least simplify frist two or three edges, which can be from one side of even from the top but at times I lose track of my orientation for a split second or even fumble the cube.
... I'm much closer to full CN than in 2H, though. The slower TPS gives me more time to see the F2L pairs when doing cross in other colours.
Doing the cross on R sounds like a good idea. I think I'll give it a go and see how it works out. I must say with OH I have been using F moves with my thumb quite successfully and I've even started doing U moves with my thumb when doing half-rotations to free up my index and pinkie finger for other moves.I think building the cross on R is the way to go for OH. In most cases it will be at most one x rotation and only RUD. Finish with a z rotation in the end which is the easiest rotation to perform OH.
I don't generally do this because I'm bad at planning my whole cross / looking ahead to my first pair so I am confused after finishing the cross resulting in a huge pause.
Building the cross on bottom my strategy is to do the double side face moves (F2, R2, B2, L2) on L and R and use thumb fingertricks for single side face moves (like F or F'), because F2 is awkward. Of course sometimes more rotations are required (for example if your cross is something like R2 B2 L2 F2 but that happens rarely).
Hope that helps.
With OH I also struggle with orientation after doing the cross because of all the z, x, and y rotations happening, but I am getting better and not wasting time with carrying on. The look ahead practice I've been putting in on 2H has also been paying off with OH.
Doing the cross on R sounds like a good idea. I think I'll give it a go and see how it works out. I must say with OH I have been using F moves with my thumb quite successfully and I've even started doing U moves with my thumb when doing half-rotations to free up my index and pinkie finger for other moves.
I also need to work on my cross to f2l transitions as I also still pause there, even with 2H which is definitely causing a second or 2 delay.
I find myself doing this quite regularly and it seems to flow quite nicely. It is a good way to practice having to turn all the faces.I'll scramble a cube OH time to time, when practicing OH.
Another thing to keep in mind regarding improving singles vs improving averages is that learning new techniques is much more likely to improve your averages. Since my PB single I've learned full OLL and greatly improved recognition of the more difficult PLLs, which has no effect on a single solve with sune and PLL skip.
I copied my latest Ao1000 (22.50) into excel for some stats.
I remember saying around Christmas that the next milestone would be making sub-20s more frequent than sup-30s. I think I can safely say now that I've achieved that.Next step, make those sub-20s more frequent than sup-25s.
Even if it feels like I haven't improved much the past few months, these stats show me that I get sub-20s twice as often as at the start of the year. That's definitely an improvement! Not to mention that Ao1000 also is almost 2 seconds faster than it was at the end of last year.
I use csTimer. Just click on Ao1000 and copy paste. It has some export function also, but that did not work for me.How do you do that ? What software are you using ?
Thanks! I think most of my improvement lately is thanks to getting more comfortable with OLL. And probably thanks to a whole lot of solving, which slowly but surely leads to better look ahead.Your progress is amazing ! All those sub-20's ! I get sub-20's only about 2-3% of the time.
I feel like my average improvement follows yours (a few months behind) though : since Christmas, my own averages went down by about 2.5 seconds (my "best mo10 of the day" went from about 27.5 to about 25 sec). I did my very first sub-25 mo10 mid-febuary and it remained an outlier for more than a month. But now I manage to get a sub-25 mo10 about every other day. (I might make more attempts per day, though)