[WR] Mats Valk 4.74 3x3 single

It's interesting how Mats is one of very few people who uses his own cube (at least without the magnets) and method (at least subset). Only other two I can think of are Chris Tran and Erno Rubik. Pretty cool group to be in. :)
I'd count Tony Fisher too, although he's not going to be speedsolving with his giant 3x3 any time soon...
 
As the first real VLS world record I would say this is the first time in history that someone has set a world 3x3 record with their own method? Also, with no ready-made pairs, I agree this is definitely one of the more complex solves that resulted in a 3x3 single record. Inspirational. Chris Tran said in his ZZ-CT talk that these days you have to get 'really lucky' to get a 3x3 single record; Mats proves this is not the case (yet). With an easy cross and a PLL skip I would count this record as only mildly lucky.
 
As the first real VLS world record I would say this is the first time in history that someone has set a world 3x3 record with their own method? Also, with no ready-made pairs, I agree this is definitely one of the more complex solves that resulted in a 3x3 single record. Inspirational. Chris Tran said in his ZZ-CT talk that these days you have to get 'really lucky' to get a 3x3 single record; Mats proves this is not the case (yet). With an easy cross and a PLL skip I would count this record as only mildly lucky.

A PLL skip definitely counts as lucky.
 
Hyo-Min Seo got a 4.94 in comp when his previous PB was 7.21. Assuming a direct correlation, anyone with a 6.84 single or lower could theoretically get a 4.69 in comp. That's a good 121 people.
Yeah, lots of people have the ability to get that time, they just need a decent scramble, good execution, and some luck to do it.
 
Hyo-Min Seo got a 4.94 in comp when his previous PB was 7.21. Assuming a direct correlation, anyone with a 6.84 single or lower could theoretically get a 4.69 in comp. That's a good 121 people.

I don't quite understand your reasoning. What if someone with 12s average gets a 6.84 single (I also don't understand why exactly 6.84)? Do you also think, that he's capable of getting sub4.75? Because for example I have official 6.87 and I am 100% sure that I won't ever get sub5 solve, even at home. It's much more convenient to say, that everyone with let's say low8 average is able to get WR-like time.
 
Back
Top