What method do you use most for 2x2?

[asacuber]

Sub 3 ortega. I'm learning CLL

wat


I use CLL and about 1/4th EG-1 and average 3.2-3.3

Yes but it is much different in real solves, because most times CLL algs are better, so choosing an EG-1 3move side or CLL 3 move side, most do CLL, just an example.

Such a solve would be easy to onelook so it'd depend on the case you got after it.

 

[Ordway Persyn]

Ortega and I average around 5ish. I really don't care about 2x2 though.

 

[FastCubeMaster]

CLL 3.2-3.9

If people know EG-1 then they probably know CLL, so that option probably could've added: "and CLL"

 

[asacuber]

CLL 3.2-3.9

If people know EG-1 then they probably know CLL, so that option probably could've added: "and CLL"

But there is no need to add that option because as you said they would know cll

 

[FastCubeMaster]

But there is no need to add that option because as you said they would know cll

I meant add it to the option that says EG-1. So then it would say:
"CLL and EG-1"

 

[asacuber]

I meant add it to the option that says EG-1. So then it would say:
"CLL and EG-1"

yea but since u said that the people who know eg1 would know CLL, there isn't any need to say "CLL and EG-1".Just "EG-1" would suffice.

 

[FastCubeMaster]

yea but since u said that the people who know eg1 would know CLL, there isn't any need to say "CLL and EG-1".Just "EG-1" would suffice.

I guess it doesn't really matter but some noobs might think it's a seperate method to learn or something.

 

[asacuber]

I guess it doesn't really matter but some noobs might think it's a seperate method to learn or something.

Oh now I understand

 

[Shiv3r]

I use CLL, with CMLL algs and recognition recycled from my roux solving. So roux CAN make you faster in other areas not just 3x3

 

[Awder]

Ortega, average 6-7s