What method do you use most for 2x2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Christopher Lai
  • Start date Start date

What method do you use most for 2x2?


  • Total voters
    57
  • Poll closed .
C

Christopher Lai

Guest
I decided to make a short poll on what method you guys use for 2x2 and what your times are?
List below what are your methods, times, and any advice you could give to fellow speedcubers!

I currently use a OP Dayan with CLL and a bit of LBL, and I average around 3.2-3.4!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you make a random face on 2x2 there is a 4/6 (66% chance) that it will be an EG-1, 1/6 (16.6% chance) of CLL and 1/6 (16.6% chance) of EG-2...
 
If you make a random face on 2x2 there is a 4/6 (66% chance) that it will be an EG-1, 1/6 (16.6% chance) of CLL and 1/6 (16.6% chance) of EG-2...
Yes but it is much different in real solves, because most times CLL algs are better, so choosing an EG-1 3move side or CLL 3 move side, most do CLL, just an example.
 
Yes but it is much different in real solves, because most times CLL algs are better, so choosing an EG-1 3move side or CLL 3 move side, most do CLL, just an example.
I know both CLL and EG-1 and I would disagree. There are some CLL algs that are better and in some cases the EG-1 alg is better; but CLL has the clear advantage of not having to adjust the D slice to put the bar in the correct location, so in that sense I agree that if you can easily make a CLL side it is better.
 
I know both CLL and EG-1 and I would disagree. There are some CLL algs that are better and in some cases the EG-1 alg is better; but CLL has the clear advantage of not having to adjust the D slice to put the bar in the correct location, so in that sense I agree that if you can easily make a CLL side it is better.
What are you disagreeing with me on?
 
Back
Top