Sep 15, 2014 #21 Petro Leum Veteran Joined May 3, 2012 Messages 809 Location Germany WCA ID 2012KALH01 ZZ
Sep 15, 2014 #22 B brian724080 Veteran Joined Jan 14, 2013 Messages 869 ZZ - It is more applicable for OH and big cubes, and there's a lot of variety in LS/Last Block + LL too
ZZ - It is more applicable for OH and big cubes, and there's a lot of variety in LS/Last Block + LL too
Sep 15, 2014 #23 lorki3 Veteran Joined May 13, 2009 Messages 337 Location The Netherlands WCA ID 2009ENGE01 YouTube Visit Channel brian724080 said: ZZ - It is more applicable for OH and big cubes, and there's a lot of variety in LS/Last Block + LL too Click to expand... I thought ZZ was pretty bad on big cubes because of the lack of inspection.
brian724080 said: ZZ - It is more applicable for OH and big cubes, and there's a lot of variety in LS/Last Block + LL too Click to expand... I thought ZZ was pretty bad on big cubes because of the lack of inspection.
Sep 15, 2014 #24 T tseitsei Veteran Joined Jan 12, 2012 Messages 1,421 Location Tampere, Finland WCA ID 2012LEHT01 lorki3 said: I thought ZZ was pretty bad on big cubes because of the lack of inspection. Click to expand... You can already orient the edges during the reduction step so no need for the long inspection... But still neither ZZ or Roux is really good at big cubes I think
lorki3 said: I thought ZZ was pretty bad on big cubes because of the lack of inspection. Click to expand... You can already orient the edges during the reduction step so no need for the long inspection... But still neither ZZ or Roux is really good at big cubes I think