rachmaninovian
Member
shall i abandon fridrich now?
Last edited by a moderator:
-
Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!
You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.
Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.
Registration is free, fast, and easy — create your account today.
Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.
[Unofficial] Sub20 3x3x3 solve with the Sandwich Method
- Thread starter rachmaninovian
- Start date
shall i abandon fridrich now?
Tim Major
Platinum Member
Yes! Abandon Fridrich, be different!
Truncator
Member
I tried this once and I failed. It is fun, though 
rachmaninovian
Member
i'd probably do fridrich still (for the sake of 5x5) and finish my OLLs. although i'm still slower with this method (barely sub 25 methinks) but its funner than fridrich..fridrich gives me much better times and i had an 18s average with fridrich o.o
DavidWoner
The Punchmaster
- Joined
- May 7, 2008
- Messages
- 3,936
- Location
- Kansas City, MO, USA
- WCA
- 2008WONE01
- YouTube
- Visit Channel
You turn so fast 0_o
Swordsman Kirby
Member
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2006
- Messages
- 1,802
Stop using a Mac. >_>
But yeah, that's pretty fast for CF.
But yeah, that's pretty fast for CF.
TMOY
Member
Sub-20 with CF is not that fast, even I can do it 
rachmaninovian
Member
haha but TMOY your main method is CF so I don't blame you for that. During the holidays I'd probably find algs for one look midges.
Kenneth
Not Alot
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2007
- Messages
- 1,693
- Location
- Kauparve, Hejde, Gotland, Sweden
- WCA
- 2005GUST01
- YouTube
- Visit Channel
Try columns, do four pairs and CLL (or CO, CPLL), then you don't have to mess with middle layer edges. There is also a "Ortega" that i useful, place the pairs anywhere (orient pairs), do CO and PBL preserving the pairs (I even learned a bunch of EG's that works with pairs to test it out = the most wowish method ever =)
If I was not so slow finding the pieces for the pairs (I'm always slow in the start, all puzzles) this would be the fastest method I know for 3x3... and remember, I know "most" of them
If I was not so slow finding the pieces for the pairs (I'm always slow in the start, all puzzles) this would be the fastest method I know for 3x3... and remember, I know "most" of them
Last edited:
Try to combine(?) Roux and standart CF.
When i was using CF i did this:
Orient white corners
Oreint yellow corners
Ortega For the Corners
Solve WB/WG/WR edges
Solve YB/YG/YR edges
Orient the remaining edges (just like in roux)
Then solve the L and R face
Finally sovle the M layer.
Here is a Video : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o7TlFxPINLw with alittle example at the end
When i was using CF i did this:
Orient white corners
Oreint yellow corners
Ortega For the Corners
Solve WB/WG/WR edges
Solve YB/YG/YR edges
Orient the remaining edges (just like in roux)
Then solve the L and R face
Finally sovle the M layer.
Here is a Video : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o7TlFxPINLw with alittle example at the end
Last edited:
miniGOINGS
Member
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2009
- Messages
- 3,049
I did this after deciding that LBL was boring. Got down from 80+ to 50- in about 3 days.
Similar threads
